Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-20 Thread Alex Herbert
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 at 03:33, Matt Juntunen wrote: > Hi Alex, > > First of all, thanks for all of the work you've done here! Second, I vote > to go with the fast dot2s implementation for LinearCombination and use it > as a static method in commons-geometry. The reason is that the scale of > accur

Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-20 Thread Matt Juntunen
rs. Regards, Matt J From: Alex Herbert Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 12:25 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2 On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 13:51, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi Alex. > > Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 11:17, Alex Herbert a > écrit : > > > >

Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-20 Thread Alex Herbert
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 13:51, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi Alex. > > Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 11:17, Alex Herbert a > écrit : > > > > [...] > > I'm a bit lost in all these bits... ;-) > I also had to remind myself of the work since it was a long time ago. > > > Any opinions on how changing Linea

Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi Alex. Le mar. 20 avr. 2021 à 11:17, Alex Herbert a écrit : > > [...] I'm a bit lost in all these bits... ;-) > Any opinions on how changing LinearComination may affect Geometry? Either > we clean up the implementation to use the fast dot2s algorithm with correct > support for splitting 53-bi

Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-20 Thread Alex Herbert
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 22:30, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 20:26, Matt Juntunen > > > What needs to be done on numbers before we're ready for > > 1.0 (aside from moving over some code from geometry)? > > The most basic utilities haven't fundamentally changed. It > will be nice

Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-19 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 20:26, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > Hi Gilles, > > Are you suggesting skipping another beta version and having numbers 1.0 and > geometry 1.0 be the next releases? Yes, that's the question which I'm asking. There is no point in waiting much longer for feedback that may neve

Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-19 Thread Matt Juntunen
o: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2 Hello Matt. Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 15:20, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > I'd like to release commons-geometry 1.0-beta2 within the next couple of > weeks. I'm planning on including GEOMETRY-118 (additional methods for &

Re: [geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-19 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello Matt. Le lun. 19 avr. 2021 à 15:20, Matt Juntunen a écrit : > > I'd like to release commons-geometry 1.0-beta2 within the next couple of > weeks. I'm planning on including GEOMETRY-118 (additional methods for > transform matrix classes) in that if possible. Is ther

[geometry] 1.0-beta2

2021-04-19 Thread Matt Juntunen
I'd like to release commons-geometry 1.0-beta2 within the next couple of weeks. I'm planning on including GEOMETRY-118 (additional methods for transform matrix classes) in that if possible. Is there anything else anyone would like to include? Regards, Matt J