Re: [functor] Checkstyle errors and new TODO's

2012-06-06 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
>Subject: Re: [functor] Checkstyle errors and new TODO's > >Olá Bruno, > >the ML is not the right place where attaching patches - can you please >fill an issue and assign it to me, so I won't forget to apply it? > >TIA! >-Simo > >http://people.apache.org/~simo

Re: [functor] Checkstyle errors and new TODO's

2012-06-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
Olá Bruno, the ML is not the right place where attaching patches - can you please fill an issue and assign it to me, so I won't forget to apply it? TIA! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/

[functor] Checkstyle errors and new TODO's

2012-06-05 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi, There are a few checkstyle errors in [functor] trunk code regarding tabs, missing space after an if statement and after (cast)ing a variable. I've attached a simple patch for it. I will file an issue for and will attach this patch there if there is no objection :) And three new TODO's we

Re: [functor] checkstyle

2008-04-03 Thread James Carman
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:37 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wow, you -are- a weirdo. ;) I prefer end-of-line > > myself, though admittedly one thing that > > (irrationally) motivates many of my Java coding > > preferences is raw file size. Objectively speaking I > > still get th

Re: [functor] checkstyle

2008-04-03 Thread sebb
On 03/04/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:44 PM, sebb > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 03/04/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > I added checkstyle with a clone from Lang, >

Re: [functor] checkstyle

2008-04-03 Thread Matt Benson
--- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 03/04/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I added checkstyle with a clone from Lang, which > is > > pretty permissive. It'd be nice since the > project is > > being revived with all new blood, as it were, if > we > > could agree on a sty

Re: [functor] checkstyle

2008-04-03 Thread Matt Benson
--- James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:44 PM, sebb > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 03/04/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I added checkstyle with a clone from Lang, > which is > > > pretty permissive. It'd be nice since the > project is

Re: [functor] checkstyle

2008-04-03 Thread James Carman
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:44 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 03/04/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I added checkstyle with a clone from Lang, which is > > pretty permissive. It'd be nice since the project is > > being revived with all new blood, as it were, if we > >

Re: [functor] checkstyle

2008-04-03 Thread sebb
On 03/04/2008, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I added checkstyle with a clone from Lang, which is > pretty permissive. It'd be nice since the project is > being revived with all new blood, as it were, if we > could agree on a style that might be a little less > idiosyncratic (IMO any

[functor] checkstyle

2008-04-03 Thread Matt Benson
I added checkstyle with a clone from Lang, which is pretty permissive. It'd be nice since the project is being revived with all new blood, as it were, if we could agree on a style that might be a little less idiosyncratic (IMO anyway) than the current codebase. I propose the following changes, at