Re: [functor] Utility classes should not have a public or default constructor.

2011-09-20 Thread Matt Benson
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > there are classes in [functor] that are affected by the checkstyle > violation as reported in the subject. > That behavior is expected by design, as reported in the comment below > >    /** >     * {@code EachElement} instanc

[functor] Utility classes should not have a public or default constructor.

2011-09-20 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, there are classes in [functor] that are affected by the checkstyle violation as reported in the subject. That behavior is expected by design, as reported in the comment below /** * {@code EachElement} instances should NOT be constructed in * standard programming. Instead