On 12 March 2013 09:23, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:16 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>
>> BTW it all happens in
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/project/commons-proper.xml
>
>
> If I understand that correctly, the Gump build is already using Maven,
> isn't it?
Yes
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:16 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> BTW it all happens in
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/project/commons-proper.xml
If I understand that correctly, the Gump build is already using Maven,
isn't it? Quoting:
org.apache.commons.fileupload
Commons File U
> Done, but it will take some while to find out if the changes are
> correct, as Gump runs take several days at present.
>
> There's a problem that causes the Maven repo proxy to hang sometimes.
> See Gump list for details
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/gump-general/201301.mbox/%3C87e
On 7 March 2013 16:16, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 16:02, Simone Tripodi wrote:
I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
[Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
If so,
On 7 March 2013 16:02, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
>>> but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
>>> [Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
>>>
>>> If so, that would surely satisfy the dependencies?
>> I agree the build file cannot be dropped whilst it is still used by Gump,
>> but can't we update FileUpload to use Maven for Gump builds?
>> [Most other components now use Maven with Gump]
>>
>> If so, that would surely satisfy the dependencies?
>
> Sure, but that wasn't what was being proposed.
On 07/03/2013 15:43, sebb wrote:
> On 7 March 2013 15:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>>
>>> while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
>>> during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
>>> related f
On 7 March 2013 15:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>>
>> while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
>> during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
>> related files to 2007, I think it would make sense
On 07/03/2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
> during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
> related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
>
> Opinions?
-1
build-gump.xml i
OK by me.
On 7 March 2013 12:11, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
> during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
> related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
>
> Opinions?
> TIA!
>
Hi all guys,
while the Maven parent and specific component pom continue to evolve
during the time, last update on Ant files is back to 2010, gump
related files to 2007, I think it would make sense to drop them
Opinions?
TIA!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.liv
11 matches
Mail list logo
