Re: [dbcp][pool] Robust pooling

2011-05-06 Thread sebb
On 6 May 2011 18:16, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 06/05/2011 17:55, Phil Steitz wrote: >> There are lots of things to consider in making DBCP manageable in >> the sense described above.  I am starting this discussion now >> because I want to make sure that we build whatever we need to build >> into poo

Re: [dbcp][pool] Robust pooling

2011-05-06 Thread Mark Thomas
On 06/05/2011 17:55, Phil Steitz wrote: > There are lots of things to consider in making DBCP manageable in > the sense described above. I am starting this discussion now > because I want to make sure that we build whatever we need to build > into pool 2 to make these features possible in DBCP 2.

[dbcp][pool] Robust pooling

2011-05-06 Thread Phil Steitz
Despite lots of user requests over the years, DBCP has always backed off the challenge of providing really robust connection pooling - i.e., seamlessly handling server or network failures. The reason for this is that from the vantage point of DBCP, doing more than just validating connections and d