gt;> >> different enough to mean the version that fixes these should be 2.0? I'm
>> >> guessing no.
>> >>
>> >> Thoughs? Comments?
>> >>
>> >> Gary
>> >>
>> >> Original message
It does not usually unless the new methods are on interfaces and then it
depends on usage.
Gary
Original message From: Gabriel Reid
Date:05/03/2014 04:22 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [csv] Release planning for commons-csv
From what I've se
should be 2.0? I'm
> >> guessing no.
> >>
> >> Thoughs? Comments?
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> Original message From: Benedikt Ritter
> <
> >> brit...@apache.org> Date:05/02/2014 13:00 (GMT-05:00)
>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> Original message From: Benedikt Ritter <
>> brit...@apache.org> Date:05/02/2014 13:00 (GMT-05:00)
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [csv] Release planning for commons-csv
>> So you're s
er <
> brit...@apache.org> Date:05/02/2014 13:00 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [csv] Release planning for commons-csv
> So you're saying we should release 1.0 from the current trunk? I
> would
> volunteer to RM.
>
>
> 2014-05-02
uessing no.
Thoughs? Comments?
Gary
Original message From: Benedikt Ritter
Date:05/02/2014 13:00 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [csv] Release planning for commons-csv
So you're saying we should release 1.0 from the current trunk? I would
voluntee
So you're saying we should release 1.0 from the current trunk? I would
volunteer to RM.
2014-05-02 16:02 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> +1 to keep the discussion going with or without patches. We need to get a
> 1.0 out the door.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Gabriel Reid
> wrote:
+1 to keep the discussion going with or without patches. We need to get a
1.0 out the door.
Gary
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. My comments are inlined below.
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
> > 2014
Hi Benedikt,
Thanks for the feedback. My comments are inlined below.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014-05-02 8:15 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Reid :
>> If there are open issues that are specifically standing in the way of
>> a release, I would be happy to assist in attempting
Hello Gabriel,
thanks for you interest in commons-csv. Please see my comments inline.
2014-05-02 8:15 GMT+02:00 Gabriel Reid :
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there is currently a specific plan or list of
> requirements to be fulfilled before the 1.0 of commons-csv is made.
>
> For me personally, a
As a user cutting my own internal bld +1
On Thursday, May 1, 2014, Gabriel Reid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there is currently a specific plan or list of
> requirements to be fulfilled before the 1.0 of commons-csv is made.
>
> For me personally, as well as (I think) other users of
Hi,
I was wondering if there is currently a specific plan or list of
requirements to be fulfilled before the 1.0 of commons-csv is made.
For me personally, as well as (I think) other users of commons-csv, it
would be very useful to have a release as soon as possible -- even if
it is only to strea
12 matches
Mail list logo
