2012/10/17 sebb :
> On 16 October 2012 21:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> 2012/10/16 Gary Gregory :
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Colebourne
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:14 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 21:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman <
> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I did not do this one as is it se
On 16 October 2012 21:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
>> > separator as noted in the Javadoc for
>> > o
On 16 October 2012 21:56, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2012/10/16 Gary Gregory :
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Colebourne
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:3
2012/10/16 Gary Gregory :
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Colebourne
> wrote:
>
>> On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Are these specif
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Are these specific examples not the words you would act
Wikipedia has "Delimiter separated text" and "Delimiter-separated values"
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delimiter-separated_values)
This suggests that CsvFormat, Rfc4180Format, and TsvFormat could be final
classes extending DsvFormat.
chas
On 10/16/12 12:50 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote:
>On Tue, O
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
> > separator as noted in the Javadoc for
> > org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.DEFAULT.
> >
>
> That's whe
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, James Carman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
> > separator as noted in the Javadoc for
> > org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.DEFAULT.
> >
>
> That's whe
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I did not do this one as is it seems RFC4180 defines CR+LF as the record
> separator as noted in the Javadoc for
> org.apache.commons.csv.CSVFormat.DEFAULT.
>
That's where the name of this component gets confusing to me. Since
it's called
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 16:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Gary Gregory >wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
> >>>
>
2012/10/16 Stephen Colebourne :
> On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
you having a di
On 16 October 2012 17:44, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>
>>> Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
>>> you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>> Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
>> you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P
>>
>
> Why not just support both? The "with*" methods
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> Are these specific examples not the words you would actually use were
> you having a discussion on the subject in English? :P
>
Why not just support both? The "with*" methods would just be aliases
for the more "natural language" method na
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 October 2012 17:08, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>>
>>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>>> system property, might be bette
On 16 October 2012 17:08, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>
>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>> system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
>> not to imply
Matt Benson wrote:
> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>
> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
> system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
> not to imply that the parameter should be in any way limited to \r o
On 16 October 2012 16:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>>
>>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.sep
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>
>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>> system property, might be better represented
On 16 October 2012 16:29, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>>
>> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
>> system property, might be better represented as "row
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
>
> - "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
> system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
> not to imply that the parameter sh
Random thoughts--no real context here, so no way to inline:
- "line separator" concept, while harmonizing with the line.separator
system property, might be better represented as "row separator" so as
not to imply that the parameter should be in any way limited to \r or
\n . I would think the defa
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
>> > formatting.
>> >
>> > With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], th
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Hi All:
> >
> > The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
> > formatting.
> >
> > With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], there are now two
> > aspects of quotin
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > Hi All:
> >
> > The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
> > formatting.
> >
> > With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], there are now two
> > aspects of quotin
+1 to Jörg, that would be my recommendation as well!
my 0.02 cents,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wro
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
> formatting.
>
> With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], there are now two
> aspects of quoting to configure: the quote character and the quote policy
> (minimal, all,
Hi All:
The format object can configure various aspects of input and output
formatting.
With my recent addition of the Quote enum for [CSV-53], there are now two
aspects of quoting to configure: the quote character and the quote policy
(minimal, all, non-numeric, and none.) FYI, 'none' is current
29 matches
Mail list logo
