Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-11 Thread sebb
On 11 September 2012 20:27, Oliver Heger wrote: > Am 11.09.2012 00:08, schrieb sebb: > >> On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb: >>> On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger wrote: > > > Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-11 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 11.09.2012 00:08, schrieb sebb: On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb: On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb: On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger wrote: Hi all, the pom was updated to make

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-11 Thread sebb
On 11 September 2012 19:22, Jörg Schaible wrote: > sebb wrote: > >> On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger >> wrote: >>> Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb: >>> On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger wrote: > > [snip] > > Some classes of [lang] are exposed in the public API of >>

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote: > On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger > wrote: >> Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb: >> >>> On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger >>> wrote: [snip] Some classes of [lang] are exposed in the public API of [configuration]. For instance, variable substitution in

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-10 Thread sebb
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger wrote: > Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb: > >> On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger >> wrote: >>> >>> Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb: >>> On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger wrote: > > > Hi all, > > the pom was up

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-10 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb: On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb: On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger wrote: Hi all, the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. This means we are free to implement major c

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-09 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 09.09.2012 18:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter: Hi Oliver, there are a lot of @author tags. As far as I know, the use of author tags is deprecated in commons, so the mentioned developers and contributors should be moved to pom.xml and changes.xml. Yes, this is true. When changing code, e.g. when

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-09 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Oliver, there are a lot of @author tags. As far as I know, the use of author tags is deprecated in commons, so the mentioned developers and contributors should be moved to pom.xml and changes.xml. Benedikt 2012/9/7 Oliver Heger : > Hi all, > > the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the curr

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-09 Thread sebb
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger wrote: > Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb: > >> On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. >>> This means we are free to implement major changes withou

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-08 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 08.09.2012 18:45, schrieb Ralph Goers: If you are going to break compatibility the package names need to be changed. I really dislike CombinedConfiguration. Having the combined nodes point into other configuration nodes makes reloading fragile which is why it now copies nodes. This means

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-08 Thread Ralph Goers
If you are going to break compatibility the package names need to be changed. I really dislike CombinedConfiguration. Having the combined nodes point into other configuration nodes makes reloading fragile which is why it now copies nodes. This means that a DynamicCombinedConfiguration that has

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-08 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb: On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger wrote: Hi all, the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce binary backwards compatibility. BC breakage will req

Re: [configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-07 Thread sebb
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi all, > > the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. > This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce > binary backwards compatibility. BC breakage will require package and Maven coordin

[configuration] Plan for 2.0

2012-09-07 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi all, the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce binary backwards compatibility. The question is: What are the goals for version 2.0? I would recommend to define a clear focus so that