On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> +1 to your suggestion, with the addition of adding ASL 1.1 to the
>> LICENSE file if it's ASL 1.1 rather than AL 2.0.
>
> The license file says ASL 1.1:
> http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jrpm/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=2&view=mar
> +1 to your suggestion, with the addition of adding ASL 1.1 to the
> LICENSE file if it's ASL 1.1 rather than AL 2.0.
The license file says ASL 1.1:
http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jrpm/trunk/LICENSE.txt?revision=2&view=markup
Some files are explicit AL 2.0:
http://jrpm.svn.sourceforge.ne
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Antonio wrote:
> 2009/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
>> I have spoken to the developers and they are willing to sign the
>> software grant and donate the code to the compress component if they
>> are mentionend in the code (guess NOTICE file would be ok too).
>
> No wait
My only point is that we don't know for sure that these folks are
*allowed* to license their code under the ASL. All we have is a
Javadoc header and an ASL license declaration in their pom file. I
understand that the ASL is very permissive.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Antonio wrote:
> 2009
No, I think you still need the software grant.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>> The software grant *donates* the code to the foundation, so all the
>> rights become of Apache itself, not of the owners.
>> The previous owners of the right will be mentioned only in the
2009/1/8 James Carman :
> No, I think you still need the software grant.
Wrong, ASL is a very permissive license, so you can do almost anything
you want with the code.
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.ap
2009/1/8 Antonio :
> 2009/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
>>> The software grant *donates* the code to the foundation, so all the
>>> rights become of Apache itself, not of the owners.
>>> The previous owners of the right will be mentioned only in the IP
>>> (intellectual property) clearance form.
>>> In
2009/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
>> The software grant *donates* the code to the foundation, so all the
>> rights become of Apache itself, not of the owners.
>> The previous owners of the right will be mentioned only in the IP
>> (intellectual property) clearance form.
>> In your case I suggest to:
>
> The software grant *donates* the code to the foundation, so all the
> rights become of Apache itself, not of the owners.
> The previous owners of the right will be mentioned only in the IP
> (intellectual property) clearance form.
> In your case I suggest to:
> 1. add the code in your software;
>
2009/1/8 Christian Grobmeier :
> I have spoken to the developers and they are willing to sign the
> software grant and donate the code to the compress component if they
> are mentionend in the code (guess NOTICE file would be ok too).
No wait!
The software grant *donates* the code to the foundatio
Great! Yes, that's the one to fax. I guess we only have one fax number
so that should be the one:
http://apache.org/foundation/contact.html
NOTICE file would be a good place. I've also come across a CREDITS
file from time to time.
cheers
--
Torsten
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 06:33, Christian Grobme
I have spoken to the developers and they are willing to sign the
software grant and donate the code to the compress component if they
are mentionend in the code (guess NOTICE file would be ok too).
Can one please give me detailled instructions how too proceed?
Guess they have to sign this:
http://
Well, are we protecting ourselves here? Just putting the ASL2 license
mumbo jumbo in the header of a file doesn't exactly mean you have the
right to license the code at all (perhaps your employer "owns"
anything you write?). I'd feel safer with some a more formal code
grant, but that's just me.
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> compress issue 241 [1] proposes to implement CPIO archives. Since the
> jRPM project allready
> has implemented the streaming code, it should be really
> straightforward to include it in compress.
> I know I am bit early since there are many other open issu
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM, James Carman wrote:
> If you could create a JIRA and ask the author to attach their code as
> a patch, that might be sufficient.
OK. I wrote the authors of the project. If they respond, I'll create a
issue and ask them for a patch.
Christian
-
If you could create a JIRA and ask the author to attach their code as
a patch, that might be sufficient.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Contacting him surely can't hurt - no matter what ;-)
>
> me neither :-)
>
>> ..but this does raise an interesting question. Surel
> Contacting him surely can't hurt - no matter what ;-)
me neither :-)
> ..but this does raise an interesting question. Surely the safest would
> be to get a software grant from him. But that frankly speaking that
> feels a bit over the top. Other opinions?
> How many classes are we talking about
> compress issue 241 [1] proposes to implement CPIO archives. Since the
> jRPM project allready
> has implemented the streaming code, it should be really
> straightforward to include it in compress.
Sure
> I know I am bit early since there are many other open issues with
> compress, but I would l
Hi all,
compress issue 241 [1] proposes to implement CPIO archives. Since the
jRPM project allready
has implemented the streaming code, it should be really
straightforward to include it in compress.
I know I am bit early since there are many other open issues with
compress, but I would like
to kno
19 matches
Mail list logo
