Re: [compress] (Internal)LZWInputStream

2015-02-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2015-02-02, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > I have a patch waiting to be committed to commons-imaging which uses > the LZW stuff in commons-compress (brief mention of it by me on > IMAGING-126), so it could break with these changes. My hope was to > wait for the next release of compress before commit

Re: [compress] (Internal)LZWInputStream

2015-02-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi I have a patch waiting to be committed to commons-imaging which uses the LZW stuff in commons-compress (brief mention of it by me on IMAGING-126), so it could break with these changes. My hope was to wait for the next release of compress before committing, so I could use that version of compres

Re: [compress] (Internal)LZWInputStream

2015-02-01 Thread sebb
On 1 February 2015 at 18:33, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> * (Internal)LZWInputStream has a bunch of protected fields that slipped >> through a few releases ago. We should add getter/setter pairs and >> deprecate using the fields. Sebb w

Re: [compress] (Internal)LZWInputStream

2015-02-01 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > * (Internal)LZWInputStream has a bunch of protected fields that slipped > through a few releases ago. We should add getter/setter pairs and > deprecate using the fields. Sebb would like to even make the fields > private assuming the

Re: [compress] (Internal)LZWInputStream

2015-02-01 Thread Gary Gregory
All I care about is binary compatibility in a minor release for most cases (not 80% of the cases, but more like 99.9%). I do not want to be in jar hell. Gary On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to bring together two separate discussions from two different >

Re: [compress] (Internal)LZWInputStream

2015-02-01 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Send from my mobile device > Am 01.02.2015 um 07:04 schrieb Stefan Bodewig : > > Hi > > I'm trying to bring together two separate discussions from two different > [VOTE]-threads. It seems as if I should cancel the RC2 vote and before > I rush another RC maybe we can get consensus on what to d

[compress] (Internal)LZWInputStream

2015-01-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi I'm trying to bring together two separate discussions from two different [VOTE]-threads. It seems as if I should cancel the RC2 vote and before I rush another RC maybe we can get consensus on what to do. * my experiments show that moving the LZWInputStream class hasn't got as big an impact