Re: [collections] Raising issues for IBM JDK

2013-03-07 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 07/03/2013 16:19, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the > TreeMap > > imlementation of this JRE. > > Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue wi

Re: [collections] Raising issues for IBM JDK

2013-03-07 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Thomas, the web page indicates. i'd suggest doing that to see if it helps * Post a message on the Java Runtimes and SDKs Java Runtimes and SDKs Forum. * Send an email directly to us at our Java Tools email. -- dims On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > after testing

Re: [collections] Raising issues for IBM JDK

2013-03-07 Thread Mark Thomas
On 07/03/2013 16:19, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the TreeMap > imlementation of this JRE. > Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue with > backing map), but some are more serious and would also requir

[collections] Raising issues for IBM JDK

2013-03-07 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the TreeMap imlementation of this JRE. Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue with backing map), but some are more serious and would also require that certain tests to be disabled when run with an IBM