On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 16:19, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the
> TreeMap
> > imlementation of this JRE.
> > Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue wi
Thomas,
the web page indicates. i'd suggest doing that to see if it helps
* Post a message on the Java Runtimes and SDKs Java Runtimes and SDKs Forum.
* Send an email directly to us at our Java Tools email.
-- dims
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after testing
On 07/03/2013 16:19, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the TreeMap
> imlementation of this JRE.
> Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue with
> backing map), but some are more serious and would also requir
Hi,
after testing ours tests with IBM JDK 6 I found several bugs in the TreeMap
imlementation of this JRE.
Some of them I could work-around (e.g. non-synced Map.Entry setValue with
backing map), but some are more serious and would also require that certain
tests to be disabled when run with an IBM