Hi Matt,
Thanks for the info. I have a Jira issue created for this (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-508). I have attached the
patch there.
Thanks
Dipanjan
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Apache lists generally don't allow attachments. Please raise a JI
Apache lists generally don't allow attachments. Please raise a JIRA issue
and attach there.
Matt
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Dipanjan Laha wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I have implemented the MultiValuedMap interface, the MultiValuedHashMap
> and a MultiValuedHashMapTest as per the discussions.
Hi Thomas,
I have implemented the MultiValuedMap interface, the MultiValuedHashMap and
a MultiValuedHashMapTest as per the discussions. I haven't completed the
documentation yet. If the implementations look fine, I will add the
remaining documentations.
A few more points regarding the implementat
Thanks for pointing this out. However, implementing Get & Put directly
would pose the following problems.
If interface MultiValuedMap extends Get>
the method "values" would be forced to have a signature of
Collection> values()
whereas we would want
Collection values().
This wont be possible a
Don't forget about the Get/Put/split map concepts from Collections 4. It
would seem you could implement those interfaces and provide that amount of
abstraction anyway.
Matt
On Feb 26, 2014 3:26 AM, "Dipanjan Laha" wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> This sounds great. Moving MultiKeyMap to the new package d
Hi Thomas,
This sounds great. Moving MultiKeyMap to the new package does sound like
the way to go ahead. I will start with the implementation of the interface
and the MultiValuedHashMap. I should be able to submit a patch with a basic
implementation and some test cases by the end of this week. I c
Hi Dipanjan,
I was thinking about a name for the new interface, but I actually like your
proposal of MultiValuedMap.
For the package, I think we can stick with multimap, and at some point we
could also move the MultiKeyMap there, which would be logical imho.
The implementation names are also sou
Hi Thomas,
It would be great if we can start the discussion on the new interface for
MultiMap and a new package for the implementations as suggested by you.
Then I'll be able to put some code together for the same.
IMO we can have
1. New Interface for MultiMap with the name MultiValuedMap or Mul
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your feedback. I created an improvement request in Jira for the
same (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-508 ) as I thought
it could be better tracked there. Sorry for the duplication in the mail
list and Jira. I have also attached a patch in Jira where I have
On 02/22/2014 02:00 PM, Dipanjan Laha wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Dipanjan,
> Recently I had the need of using a MultiMap in one of my projects. I found
> that commons collection already has a MultiMap interface and an
> implementation.
>
> While using the same, I found that the MultiMap interface has m
Hello,
Recently I had the need of using a MultiMap in one of my projects. I found
that commons collection already has a MultiMap interface and an
implementation.
While using the same, I found that the MultiMap interface has methods that
are not strongly typed even though the interface supports g
11 matches
Mail list logo
