Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-04-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Henri Yandell wrote On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Niall Pemberton Perhaps if its going to be a while before 3.3 release gets out, then we could just release Collections 3.2.1 which is just 3.2 re-packaged ready for OSGi. I could do that if 3.3 is going to be delayed. Might be worth it.

Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-04-09 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just curious, what's the current state? In Apache Sling we would need an > > OSGi enabled release in two weeks :) Now, don't get me wrong, I

Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-04-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious, what's the current state? In Apache Sling we would need an > OSGi enabled release in two weeks :) Now, don't get me wrong, I don't want > to push or force you to do a release (especially as I'm not able to h

Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-04-09 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Just curious, what's the current state? In Apache Sling we would need an OSGi enabled release in two weeks :) Now, don't get me wrong, I don't want to push or force you to do a release (especially as I'm not able to help with the open issues). I would just like to know, if it might be possible

Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-03-23 Thread Dave Meikle
On 19/03/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/19/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Specifically for James Carman - how does Dave's patch to your > > COLLECTIONS-194 look? > > I would rather see it with the nopTransformer(), personally. This > would remove the

Re: [collections] 3.3 issues

2008-03-19 Thread James Carman
On 3/19/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a peek at some of the interesting issues in the 3.3 TODO list > that need discussion: > > * COLLECTIONS-238 - Allowing ExtendedProperties to have empty values. > ie) "foo=" would result in a key of foo existing. It's not just that t

[collections] 3.3 issues

2008-03-18 Thread Henri Yandell
Here's a peek at some of the interesting issues in the 3.3 TODO list that need discussion: * COLLECTIONS-238 - Allowing ExtendedProperties to have empty values. ie) "foo=" would result in a key of foo existing. Is anyone concerned about backwards compatibility with that? I'm happy with it - it s