Re: [collection] v4 CompliantBag

2013-07-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Enough time has passed since I proposed the change, it is now in SVN. Gary On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 07/02/2013 05:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > CompliantBag is just terrible, I'm sorry. > > > > If we want to follow [DecoratorType][CollectionType] then Collect

Re: [collection] v4 CompliantBag

2013-07-02 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 07/02/2013 05:24 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > CompliantBag is just terrible, I'm sorry. > > If we want to follow [DecoratorType][CollectionType] then CollectionBag? +1 Thomas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.ap

Re: [collection] v4 CompliantBag

2013-07-02 Thread Gary Gregory
CompliantBag is just terrible, I'm sorry. If we want to follow [DecoratorType][CollectionType] then CollectionBag? Gary On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 07/01/2013 09:06 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > I find the class name CompliantBag pretty confusing.

Re: [collection] v4 CompliantBag

2013-07-01 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 07/01/2013 09:06 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > I find the class name CompliantBag pretty confusing. Compliant with what? > The Javadoc says Collection so, why not call it BagCollection? I agree that CompliantBag is not a very good choice, but the notation in collections was to name dec

Re: [collection] v4 CompliantBag

2013-07-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 01/07/2013 21:06, Gary Gregory a écrit : > I find the class name CompliantBag pretty confusing. Compliant with what? > The Javadoc says Collection so, why not call it BagCollection? +1 Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-m

[collection] v4 CompliantBag

2013-07-01 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: I find the class name CompliantBag pretty confusing. Compliant with what? The Javadoc says Collection so, why not call it BagCollection? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in