On Aug 30, 2012, at 18:22, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:05:50 -0400
> schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
>> On Aug 30, 2012, at 17:58, Christian Hammers wrote:
>>
>>> Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:21:43 -0400
>>> schrieb Gary Gregory :
>>>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhar
Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:05:50 -0400
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 17:58, Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> > Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:21:43 -0400
> > schrieb Gary Gregory :
> >
> >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> there are quite som
On Aug 30, 2012, at 17:58, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:21:43 -0400
> schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> there are quite some differences on the javadoc style in the source
>>> files, e.g. the number of sp
Am Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:21:43 -0400
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > there are quite some differences on the javadoc style in the source
> > files, e.g. the number of spaces before a @param description,
> > whether there is an emp
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are quite some differences on the javadoc style in the source
> files, e.g. the number of spaces before a @param description, whether
> there is an empty line between @param, @return and @throws.
>
I like the default Eclipse
Hi,
there are quite some differences on the javadoc style in the source
files, e.g. the number of spaces before a @param description, whether
there is an empty line between @param, @return and @throws.
Any thoughts on that? I am willing to clean up but do not want to impose
any personal preferenc
