Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-20 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mar 20, 2012, at 14:42, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 03/19/2012 09:22 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >> >>> On 03/19/2012 08:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 03/19/20

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-20 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/19/2012 09:22 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > >> On 03/19/2012 08:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart >>> wrote: >>> On 03/19/2012 05:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Ok, can you: (1)

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-19 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 03/19/2012 08:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart > > wrote: > > > >> On 03/19/2012 05:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> > >>> Ok, can you: (1) back out the QuotedPrintableCodec changes and (2) >

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-19 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/19/2012 08:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On (2): Looks good. I committed a couple of tweaks. > > Why should we have the almost same impl InflaterIS WRT the limit on the > size of the input skip param? What if I want to skip in some giant > multi-gig file (unlikely perhaps)? Oh, I misunderst

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-19 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/19/2012 08:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > >> On 03/19/2012 05:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >>> Ok, can you: (1) back out the QuotedPrintableCodec changes and (2) >> complete >>> Codec-130? >> >> (1) I am working on it, svn seems to b

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-19 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 03/19/2012 05:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Ok, can you: (1) back out the QuotedPrintableCodec changes and (2) > complete > > Codec-130? > > (1) I am working on it, svn seems to be dead over here in EU >The reverted diff will be a

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-19 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/19/2012 05:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Ok, can you: (1) back out the QuotedPrintableCodec changes and (2) complete > Codec-130? (1) I am working on it, svn seems to be dead over here in EU The reverted diff will be attached to the issue (2) I managed to commit it, would be nice if you

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-19 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 03/18/2012 05:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > >> One additional thing: the fix for the QuotedPrintableCodec changed > >> (slightly) the behavior of the encoding/decoding. As I have seen in some > >> other classes, similar changes have bee

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-18 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/18/2012 05:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> One additional thing: the fix for the QuotedPrintableCodec changed >> (slightly) the behavior of the encoding/decoding. As I have seen in some >> other classes, similar changes have been documented in the javadoc of >> the affected methods as well (e.

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-18 Thread Gary Gregory
On Mar 17, 2012, at 15:28, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 03/16/2012 08:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Hi All: >> >> FYI: I am thinking about a 1.7 release soon to pick up 3 fixes and one new >> feature: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310464&version=12320173

Re: [codec] Release 1.7

2012-03-17 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 03/16/2012 08:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > FYI: I am thinking about a 1.7 release soon to pick up 3 fixes and one new > feature: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310464&version=12320173 > > Releasing early, releasing often! > > Thoughts? I t