Err I meant CODEC-89 and CODEC-101. Those were the embarrassing bugs
from my point of view!
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Julius Davies wrote:
> +1 because "4" is an unlucky number and codec-1.4 has two unlucky bugs
> (CODEC-96 and CODEC-101) that 1.5 won't have
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 201
+1 because "4" is an unlucky number and codec-1.4 has two unlucky bugs
(CODEC-96 and CODEC-101) that 1.5 won't have
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/01/2011 15:37, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
>> Because of the addition of the ColognePhonetic class, I propose that th
Le 21/01/2011 15:37, Gary Gregory a écrit :
Because of the addition of the ColognePhonetic class, I propose that the next
release be called 1.5 and not 1.4.1.
Thoughts?
That makes sense, it's a feature update.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
+1 also for me, since it just adds new features, I agree with you.
Have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 January 2011 14:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hi All:
>>
>> Because of the addition of the
On 21 January 2011 14:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Because of the addition of the ColognePhonetic class, I propose that the next
> release be called 1.5 and not 1.4.1.
>
> Thoughts?
+1, it's not just a bugfix release.
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Rocket Software
> 3340 P
Hi All:
Because of the addition of the ColognePhonetic class, I propose that the next
release be called 1.5 and not 1.4.1.
Thoughts?
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 * Atlanta, GA 30326 * USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560
Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware
