Hi Jörg...
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:joerg.schai...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 01:17
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote at
:flame...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 21:34
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
>
> Would love to see this.
>
> I'll go and put the historic Lang ones together if you let me know how
> you'd like it to
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote at Monday, 5. April 2010 18:16:
> Seeing the discussion about [daemon] and not releasing made me think of
> another use for a test jar file.
>
> What I would like to know when evaluating an RC for releasing a
> maintenance of a commons component (from x.y.n to x.y.n+1
test-1.0.1.jar, hm...
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Seagull Software
> email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
> email: ggreg...@apache.org
> www.seagullsoftware.com
>
>
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 16:58
> To: Co
On 05/04/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:17
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
> >
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:17
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
>
> On 05/04/2010, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I do not think Clirr is e
lures
are OK and which are not. This is not to say that the tests should not
be run, just that they may involve a lot of manual checking.
> Gary
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 05, 20
ailto:gudnabr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 10:00
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar plus [daemon]
>
> Is it not sufficient to simply run clirr reports before a release?
>
> -Matt
>
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 11:16 AM, G
...@seagullsoftware.com
email: ggreg...@apache.org
www.seagullsoftware.com
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 16:58
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar
I am starting with codec and lang since it what I am most
interested in ATM...
I would like to run commons.xxx
Subject: [codec][lang] Provide a test jar
I am starting with codec and lang since it what I am most interested in ATM...
I would like to run commons.xxx unit tests as part of my build as a sanity
check when I try out a new combo of JVM, OS, jars, etc.
Right now, I would have to compile the unit
I am starting with codec and lang since it what I am most interested in ATM...
I would like to run commons.xxx unit tests as part of my build as a sanity
check when I try out a new combo of JVM, OS, jars, etc.
Right now, I would have to compile the unit tests as part of my build which is
not gr
11 matches
Mail list logo
