Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> First, thanks for putting this together. Its great to have the docs updated.
>
> While I have not looked at the document in detail, some high-level
> comments below ...
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I have made my first attempt at updating the
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 07/04/2010, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I've been deleting desirable goals from the docs :)
>> >
>> > I think it's more desirable that they be short, sweet and focused;
>> > t
On 07/04/2010, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I've been deleting desirable goals from the docs :)
> >
> > I think it's more desirable that they be short, sweet and focused;
> > than that they cover all possibilities.
> >
>
>
>
> Id
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> I've been deleting desirable goals from the docs :)
>
> I think it's more desirable that they be short, sweet and focused;
> than that they cover all possibilities.
>
Ideally:
* half a screen-full's worth recipe on one webpage, no scroll
First, thanks for putting this together. Its great to have the docs updated.
While I have not looked at the document in detail, some high-level
comments below ...
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I have made my first attempt at updating the documentation here:
> http://commo
erify it from Europe, the
> proxy IP 209.237.227.195 does not work. (Ping fails, telnet 209.237.227.195
> 80 fails). Any updated IP ?
> Thanks
I've been using:
minotaur-2.apache.org:80 = 140.211.11.10:80
from the UK.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://
ork. (Ping fails, telnet 209.237.227.195
80 fails). Any updated IP ?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/all-Release-preparation-documentation-tp1751669p1753162.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:54 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think it might be useful to add a note regarding consistency between
> changes.xml, RELEASE-NOTES and JIRA.
>
> For example, if JIRA FOO-1234 is fixed in release 1.2, then IMO it
> should have a JIRA "fix" release of 1.2, and appear in the
> changes
On 05/04/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I have made my first attempt at updating the documentation here:
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/index.html
>
> Given that the previous docs were so out of date as to be pretty
> much worthless, I thought it best to push things along with CTR -
> actual
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> I have made my first attempt at updating the documentation here:
>> http://commons.apache.org/releases/index.html
>
> Thanks for this documentation, Phil.
>
> I have one question and one comment.
>
> In the "Create the release candidate" section, y
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> I have made my first attempt at updating the documentation here:
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/index.html
Thanks for this documentation, Phil.
I have one question and one comment.
In the "Create the release candidate" section, you write: "Note that the
release cand
I have made my first attempt at updating the documentation here:
http://commons.apache.org/releases/index.html
Given that the previous docs were so out of date as to be pretty
much worthless, I thought it best to push things along with CTR -
actually "PTR" (p = publish). I am sure there are some
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Matt Benson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Matt Benson
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > -
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Matt Benson
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > --- Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> --- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Matt Benson
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Is a `mv
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Matt Benson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > --- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:54 P
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Matt Benson
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Is a `mvn site` from a src
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Matt Benson
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Is a `mvn site` from a src distribution supposed
>> to
>> > generate download_[component].cg
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is a `mvn site` from a src distribution supposed
> to
> > generate download_[component].cgi?
>
>
> No.
>
>
> > If not, are we
> > intended to make sure we preserve th
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is a `mvn site` from a src distribution supposed to
> generate download_[component].cgi?
No.
> If not, are we
> intended to make sure we preserve the existing file or
> re-create it when deploying the site?
Don't need
Is a `mvn site` from a src distribution supposed to
generate download_[component].cgi? If not, are we
intended to make sure we preserve the existing file or
re-create it when deploying the site? This is
confusing to me.
Thanks,
Matt
22 matches
Mail list logo
