Re: [all] jakarta still appearing in Reply-to header

2008-04-12 Thread Luc Maisonobe
sebb wrote: On 06/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that the Reply-to header for commons list still contains a reference to > Jakarta. I first thought my client badly rewrote this, but now I think the > header is already set up like this from the beg

Re: [all] jakarta still appearing in Reply-to header

2008-03-06 Thread sebb
On 06/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that the Reply-to header for commons list still contains a > reference to > Jakarta. I first thought my client badly rewrote this, but now I think the > header is already set up like this from the beginning. For t

[all] jakarta still appearing in Reply-to header

2008-03-06 Thread luc . maisonobe
Hello, It seems that the Reply-to header for commons list still contains a reference to Jakarta. I first thought my client badly rewrote this, but now I think the header is already set up like this from the beginning. For the dev list, it reads: Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" I t