sebb a écrit :
I've now done the other Commons proper projects in trunk.
There will be some other incorrect DOAP files in branches, but none of
them are currently listed in files.xml so they won't affect the
projects web-site.
Also added Exec and Proxy to files.xml as they were missing.
Thank
On 28/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:47 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 28/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> >> On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:47 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 28/05/2009, sebb wrote:
>> On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> >
>> > > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please?
>> >
>> >
>> > Just as a note - there's
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:47 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 28/05/2009, sebb wrote:
>> On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> >
>> > > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please?
>> >
>> >
>> > Just as a note - there's
On 28/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> > > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please?
> >
> >
> > Just as a note - there's no reason why someone can't do all of them if
> > th
On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please?
>
>
> Just as a note - there's no reason why someone can't do all of them if
> they want.
BTW, the DOAPs are referenced from
http:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please?
Just as a note - there's no reason why someone can't do all of them if
they want.
Should be a simple regex.
Hen
On 27/05/2009, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > I noticed that most of the Commons components listed on
> > projects.apache.org have an empty release history. This is due to an
> > incorrect syntax in the doap files. The releases are defined with:
> >
> >
> > commons
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I noticed that most of the Commons components listed on
> projects.apache.org have an empty release history. This is due to an
> incorrect syntax in the doap files. The releases are defined with:
>
>
> commons-codec
> 2004-07-10
> 1.3
>
>
> but it should
DOAP for [math] has been updated.
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I noticed that most of the Commons components listed on
projects.apache.org have an empty release history. This is due to an
incorrect syntax in the doap files. The releases are defined with:
commons-codec
2004-07-10
1.3
I noticed that most of the Commons components listed on
projects.apache.org have an empty release history. This is due to an
incorrect syntax in the doap files. The releases are defined with:
commons-codec
2004-07-10
1.3
but it should be:
commons-codec
2004-07-10
11 matches
Mail list logo