Hi.
Noting FTR (in conclusion of a discussion that led to nowhere) that,
among the 27 GSoC projects that will take place at the ASF this year,
one has the title "Apache Mahout Refactoring the Website".
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e
Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 23:55, sebb a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 14:40, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 14:29, Gary Gregory a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:00 AM Gilles Sadowski
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > Le
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 14:40, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 14:29, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:00 AM Gilles Sadowski
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 13:12, Gary Gregory a
> > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > > It'
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 12:15, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 12:57, Maxim Solodovnik a
> écrit :
> >
> > Please NOTE 1.27 from here: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules :)
>
> Thanks for this reminder.
>
> In the other thread[1], Piotr mentioned
> > 1. Moving fr
Hi.
Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 14:29, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:00 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 13:12, Gary Gregory a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > It's unclear to me if we need the PMC's approval for this. We
> > > certainly did not v
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:00 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 13:12, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> >
> > It's unclear to me if we need the PMC's approval for this. We
> > certainly did not vote on it.
Well, I certainly would like to know exactly what is proposed here.
Doe
Hi.
Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 13:12, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> It's unclear to me if we need the PMC's approval for this. We
> certainly did not vote on it.
Well, this thread is meant to gather opinions about this.
No need to vote if there is a clear argument, one way or
the other.
> It just loo
Hi.
Le mer. 22 janv. 2025 à 12:57, Maxim Solodovnik a écrit :
>
> Please NOTE 1.27 from here: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules :)
Thanks for this reminder.
In the other thread[1], Piotr mentioned
> 1. Moving from SVN to Git should be easy.
> 2. Converting from a variety of formats to A
It's unclear to me if we need the PMC's approval for this. We
certainly did not vote on it. It just looks like busy work to me for
little to no gain.
Gary
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 6:45 AM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> This is a formal follow-up of the proposal made there:
> https://lists.a
Please NOTE 1.27 from here: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules :)
from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 18:48 Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> On 22.01.2025 12:51, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > * Who would be willing to co-mentor the project?
>
> I can co-mentor t
Hi Gilles,
On 22.01.2025 12:51, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
* Who would be willing to co-mentor the project?
I can co-mentor the project.
Piotr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comman
Hi.
This is a formal follow-up of the proposal made there:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/3h4stmg8onfj9oyl8xsby1wpk2qj0p77
IOW:
* Who objects to this (because...)?
* Who would be willing to co-mentor the project?
Regards,
Gilles
-
I have posted two ideas for GSoC mini projects under:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STATISTICS-54
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-186
Alex
Le ven. 25 févr. 2022 à 04:39, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> I just added a similar placeholder issue for geometry:
Thanks!
I've added GEOMETRY-144 to the list.
Regards,
Gilles
> [...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@c
I just added a similar placeholder issue for geometry:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-145. I hope those are
the kinds of ideas we're going for here.
Regards,
Matt J
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:05 PM Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Ping.
>
> Nothing for "Geometry", "Statistics", ... (?)
Ping.
Nothing for "Geometry", "Statistics", ... (?)
;-)
Regards,
Gilles
Le mer. 9 févr. 2022 à 14:57, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> Hi.
>
> >>> [...]
> > > >
> > > > Shall we open a "GSoC 2022" report in each concerned JIRA project?
> > >
> > > Yes. I think we just create some tickets and tag t
Hi.
>>> [...]
> > >
> > > Shall we open a "GSoC 2022" report in each concerned JIRA project?
> >
> > Yes. I think we just create some tickets and tag them with the
> > appropriate tag (GSOC 2022 ?). There should be some left over from
> > last time to repurpose or use as templates for new ones.
>
Hello.
Le mer. 2 févr. 2022 à 10:47, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 15:06, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Le jeu. 27 janv. 2022 à 18:09, Alex Herbert a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > I would be willing to go through GSOC again.
> >
> > Thanks; I know that back in 202
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 15:06, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Le jeu. 27 janv. 2022 à 18:09, Alex Herbert a
> écrit :
> >
> > I would be willing to go through GSOC again.
>
> Thanks; I know that back in 2020, it had been a disproportionate
> amount of work...
>
> > I think that the
> > sta
Hello.
Le jeu. 27 janv. 2022 à 18:09, Alex Herbert a écrit :
>
> I would be willing to go through GSOC again.
Thanks; I know that back in 2020, it had been a disproportionate
amount of work...
> I think that the
> statistics component could again serve as a project. There are some
> packages in
I would be willing to go through GSOC again. I think that the
statistics component could again serve as a project. There are some
packages in Math that could be moved to make use of the updated
distributions (e.g. math.stat.inference) or perhaps a reworking of the
math.stat.descriptive package to s
I think this would be a great idea. There's even some potential work
that can be done related to fuzz testing if we want to expand our
OSS-Fuzz coverage. I imagine we have plenty of interesting Jira
tickets that could make for GSoC projects, too.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 7:16 AM Gilles Sadowski wr
Hello.
Do we want to come up with a common (Commons) call for
contributions?
[I.e. identify components/areas/features where help would
be appreciated, who can provide "mentorship" (even with
strictly limited available time), what level of proficiency (with
Java and tooling) is required from candid
Hi all,
Though I'm not having the GSoC recognition this year I would like to
contribute ASF at my best and I begin it from my proposed idea.
Hope you all will support me to achieve it.
Best Regards,
Gimhana.
On 4 May 2018 at 04:19, Gilles wrote:
>
> One of the benefits of team work and being p
One of the benefits of team work and being part of a "community"
is that processes are supposedly more robust, even if not
everyone does the right thing all the time. Or so I thought.
Gilles
On Thu, 3 May 2018 18:39:12 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/05/18 15:42, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 3 May
On 03/05/18 15:42, Gilles wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2018 13:56:06 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 03/05/18 13:15, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Thu, 3 May 2018 12:59:04 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/05/18 12:41, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Should we worry that there is no email traffic about
>>>
On Thu, 3 May 2018 13:56:06 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/05/18 13:15, Gilles wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2018 12:59:04 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/05/18 12:41, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
Should we worry that there is no email traffic about
the GSoC proposals?
Did we have any GSoC proposals?
Yes.[1
On 03/05/18 13:15, Gilles wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2018 12:59:04 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 03/05/18 12:41, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Should we worry that there is no email traffic about
>>> the GSoC proposals?
>>
>> Did we have any GSoC proposals?
>
> Yes.[1]
No. Those are not proposals.
On Thu, 3 May 2018 12:59:04 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/05/18 12:41, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
Should we worry that there is no email traffic about
the GSoC proposals?
Did we have any GSoC proposals?
Yes.[1]
Were any accepted?
By whom?
I have no idea about the formal process but understood
On 03/05/18 12:41, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Should we worry that there is no email traffic about
> the GSoC proposals?
Did we have any GSoC proposals? Were any accepted? I recall one mentor
request from Commons and I don't see that mentor listed as requesting to
mentor a proposal in the (internal
Hi.
Should we worry that there is no email traffic about
the GSoC proposals?
Regards,
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the welcome. I'm very pleased to have been accepted into
Google Summer of Code under the ASF. I've been a long-time user of
Apache software projects, and I'm happy to now have the opportunity to
contribute something back. If anyone has any questions for me about my
project,
Dear Rahul,
Thank you for your passional and openhanded welcome ceremony :-)
It is my honor to do something for Apache, it helps me so much, i should
give some feed back, now, opportunity comes, I am pleased to work with you
guys.
Regards
Long
2010/4/29 Rahul Akolkar
> This year, we have two
This year, we have two accepted projects for GSoC 2010.
Congratulations, Jake and Long!
We now begin what GSoC refers to as the community bonding period. So,
Jake and Long -- if you have any questions about any aspect of the ASF
in general or Commons in particular, please feel free to ask. Theres
The results are out:
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/asf/about.html
Apache Commons got no slot this year despite some really good
applications received. The ranking system was a bit biased toward
projects with more mentors, hopefully this will be fixed for the next
Summer of Code.
Emmanuel
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd been struggling - Codec has some phonetic codecs to implement, but
> there's not a huge amout there. CSV could be hooked to Performance.
> There are lots of places that could use improved unit tests.
>
> Generally th
On 3/10/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd been struggling - Codec has some phonetic codecs to implement, but
> there's not a huge amout there. CSV could be hooked to Performance.
> There are lots of places that could use improved unit tests.
>
> Generally though - it always feel
I'd been struggling - Codec has some phonetic codecs to implement, but
there's not a huge amout there. CSV could be hooked to Performance.
There are lots of places that could use improved unit tests.
Generally though - it always feels that we lack something big enough.
Which makes sense; we're a v
Torsten Curdt a écrit :
Feel free to add it to the wiki. Would you do the mentoring?
Yes I'll be available to do the mentoring.
Just wondering if that isn't a bit too little work for 1-2 month full time.
Writing only one configuration is probably not long enough for 2 months
(btw writing
Hi!
> Any idea for GSoC [1]? I think it would be worth participating
VFS or IO: File Alteration Monitor with native support (I can sponsor
some basic code-base for linux). If it is located in IO or in another
package it should be possible to plugin VFS. Means, should not deal with
plain java.io.Fil
Feel free to add it to the wiki. Would you do the mentoring?
Just wondering if that isn't a bit too little work for 1-2 month full
time.
cheers
--
Torsten
On 10.03.2008, at 12:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
There are some TODOs for Commons Configuration that may fit as GSoC
topics :
CONFIGUR
There are some TODOs for Commons Configuration that may fit as GSoC topics :
CONFIGURATION-312 WindowsConfiguration
CONFIGURATION-258 JSON configuration
CONFIGURATION-198 OGDL configuration
CONFIGURATION-201 YAML configuration
These are new configuration formats, it might be interesting
Any idea for GSoC [1]? I think it would be worth participating
cheers
--
Torsten
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCodeMentor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
43 matches
Mail list logo
