Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-12 Thread sebb
On 12 May 2013 21:56, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 11/05/2013 23:25, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >> Le 11/05/2013 15:45, Gary Gregory a écrit : >>> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:02 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 11 May 2013 13:25, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe w

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-12 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 11/05/2013 23:25, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > Le 11/05/2013 15:45, Gary Gregory a écrit : >> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:02 AM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 11 May 2013 13:25, Gary Gregory wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe >>> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Le 09/05/2013

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On May 12, 2013, at 8:01, sebb wrote: > On 11 May 2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:02 AM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 11 May 2013 13:25, Gary Gregory wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe >>> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Le 09/05/2013 20:03,

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-12 Thread sebb
On 11 May 2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:02 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 11 May 2013 13:25, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe > >wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Sebb, >> >> >> >> Le 09/05/2013 20:03, sebb a écrit : >> >> > On 9 May 2013 18:28, L

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-11 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 11/05/2013 15:45, Gary Gregory a écrit : > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:02 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 11 May 2013 13:25, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe >> wrote: >>> Hi Sebb, Le 09/05/2013 20:03, sebb a écrit : > On 9 May 2013 18:28, Luc Ma

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-11 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:02 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11 May 2013 13:25, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe >wrote: > > > >> Hi Sebb, > >> > >> Le 09/05/2013 20:03, sebb a écrit : > >> > On 9 May 2013 18:28, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >> L

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-11 Thread sebb
On 11 May 2013 13:25, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> Hi Sebb, >> >> Le 09/05/2013 20:03, sebb a écrit : >> > On 9 May 2013 18:28, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Le 08/05/2013 22:46, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-11 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Le 09/05/2013 20:03, sebb a écrit : > > On 9 May 2013 18:28, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Le 08/05/2013 22:46, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Gary Gregory a écrit : > >>> > On Wed, May 8, 20

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-10 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Sebb, Le 09/05/2013 20:03, sebb a écrit : > On 9 May 2013 18:28, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Le 08/05/2013 22:46, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >>> >>> >>> >>> Gary Gregory a écrit : >>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > In the Maven output I see: >

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-09 Thread sebb
On 9 May 2013 18:28, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > Le 08/05/2013 22:46, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >> >> >> >> Gary Gregory a écrit : >> >>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Gary Gregory >>> wrote: >>> In the Maven output I see: [INFO] Skipping JaCoCo execution due to missing exe

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, Le 08/05/2013 22:46, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > > > > Gary Gregory a écrit : > >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >> >>> In the Maven output I see: >>> >>> [INFO] Skipping JaCoCo execution due to missing execution data file >>> >> >> Which I from running "mvn cl

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Gary Gregory a écrit : >On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Gary Gregory >wrote: > >> In the Maven output I see: >> >> [INFO] Skipping JaCoCo execution due to missing execution data file >> > >Which I from running "mvn clean site". Perhaps should you try "mvn clean test site"? I did not run cle

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > In the Maven output I see: > > [INFO] Skipping JaCoCo execution due to missing execution data file > Which I from running "mvn clean site". Gary > > Gary > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> >> >> >> Gary Gregor

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Gary Gregory
In the Maven output I see: [INFO] Skipping JaCoCo execution due to missing execution data file Gary On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > > > Gary Gregory a écrit : > > >On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Luc Maisonobe > >wrote: > > > >> Le 08/05/2013 21:11, Gary Gregory a é

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Gary Gregory a écrit : >On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Luc Maisonobe >wrote: > >> Le 08/05/2013 21:11, Gary Gregory a écrit : >> > I updated my local commons-io to 29-SNAPSHOT and I do not see a >coverage >> > report. >> > >> > How is that fixed? >> >> Well, I did not have to do anything for

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 08/05/2013 21:11, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > I updated my local commons-io to 29-SNAPSHOT and I do not see a coverage > > report. > > > > How is that fixed? > > Well, I did not have to do anything for [math]. Did you install the > snapshot

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 08/05/2013 21:58, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > Le 08/05/2013 21:11, Gary Gregory a écrit : >> I updated my local commons-io to 29-SNAPSHOT and I do not see a coverage >> report. >> >> How is that fixed? > > Well, I did not have to do anything for [math]. Did you install the > snapshot locally with

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 08/05/2013 21:11, Gary Gregory a écrit : > I updated my local commons-io to 29-SNAPSHOT and I do not see a coverage > report. > > How is that fixed? Well, I did not have to do anything for [math]. Did you install the snapshot locally with "mvn install"? Don't you have the skipReports property

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Gary Gregory
I updated my local commons-io to 29-SNAPSHOT and I do not see a coverage report. How is that fixed? Gary On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:44 AM, luc wrote: > Le 2013-04-05 00:10, Gary Gregory a écrit : > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-05-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, Le 05/04/2013 22:49, Gary Gregory a écrit : > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> On 4/4/13 1:03 PM, sebb wrote: >>> CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called "reporting". >>> >>> The profile was activated by default, but could be disabled by using >>> >>> -DskipRepor

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-04-05 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 4/4/13 1:03 PM, sebb wrote: > > CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called "reporting". > > > > The profile was activated by default, but could be disabled by using > > > > -DskipReports=true > > or > > -P!reporting > > > > IIRC, the idea was

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-04-05 Thread Phil Steitz
On 4/4/13 1:03 PM, sebb wrote: > CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called "reporting". > > The profile was activated by default, but could be disabled by using > > -DskipReports=true > or > -P!reporting > > IIRC, the idea was to move expensive (long-running) reports to a profile > that could be di

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-04-05 Thread luc
Le 2013-04-05 00:10, Gary Gregory a écrit : On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb wrote: CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called "reporting". The profile was activated by default, but could be disabled by using -DskipReports=true or -P!reporting IIRC, the idea was to move expensive (long-r

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-04-04 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb wrote: > CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called "reporting". > > The profile was activated by default, but could be disabled by using > > -DskipReports=true > or > -P!reporting > > IIRC, the idea was to move expensive (long-running) reports to a profile > t

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-04-04 Thread Adrian Crum
Thank you for working on this. The original proposal was to replace Cobertura with something else. I asked that the sub projects have an option to use whatever reporting tool they want. So, it would be fine if some other reporting tool was the default as long as sub projects can use something

Re: [ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-04-04 Thread Honton, Charles
I recommend changing code coverage to jacoco with a skip.jacoco property. [see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCD7CB15 7.23020%25charles_honton%40intuit.com%3E for reasons] Regards, chas On 4/4/13 1:03 PM, "sebb" wrote: >CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile c

[ALL] Cobertura and Parent POM

2013-04-04 Thread sebb
CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called "reporting". The profile was activated by default, but could be disabled by using -DskipReports=true or -P!reporting IIRC, the idea was to move expensive (long-running) reports to a profile that could be disabled if necessary. However Cobertura causes p

Re: [all] Cobertura...

2008-06-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are we opposed to using Cobertura coverage reports in Apache Commons >> project sites? > > Its fine to use it as part of a components webseit,

Re: [all] Cobertura...

2008-02-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are we opposed to using Cobertura coverage reports in Apache Commons project sites? Its fine to use it as part of a components webseit, but Cobertura includes three javascri

Re: [all] Cobertura...

2008-02-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are we opposed to using Cobertura coverage reports in Apache Commons project sites? Its fine to use it as part of a components webseit, but Cobertura includes three javascript files that shouldn't

Re: [all] Cobertura...

2008-02-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are we opposed to using Cobertura coverage reports in Apache Commons > project sites? Its fine to use it as part of a components webseit, but Cobertura includes three javascript files that shouldn't be distributed as part

[all] Cobertura...

2008-02-23 Thread James Carman
Are we opposed to using Cobertura coverage reports in Apache Commons project sites? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]