On 5/5/11 1:26 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
>> Commons proper components that are no longer under active
>> development. I would like to propose that we extend the "dormant"
>> classi
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
> Commons proper components that are no longer under active
> development. I would like to propose that we extend the "dormant"
> classification on the web site to include components
sounds reasonable, +1
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
> Commons proper components that are no longer under active
> development. I would like
As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
Commons proper components that are no longer under active
development. I would like to propose that we extend the "dormant"
classification on the web site to include components that have had
releases. I am not sure whether we need to d
