Glad to see my interpretation of the need for the software grant seems
to be the accepted consensus. IMO that is the distinction between
keeping the code you wrote on your own hardware and putting it on
github/sf/etc.
+1
Matt
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> +1
>
> Oliver
+1
Oliver
Am 11.06.2011 12:16, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all guys,
after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
spare time to dedicate to oss :D ) to accept Meiyo as a new component
in Sandbox.
I alr
Forgot to add my +1 to accept the code.
Thanks!
Phil
On 6/11/11 10:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 6/11/11 4:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> [X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
>>> [ ] +/-0
>>> [ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
>> Interesting project, but is a
On 6/11/11 4:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> [X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
>> [ ] +/-0
>> [ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
> Interesting project, but is a vote really necessary?
It is not necessary to VOTE to begin work on a new sandbox
component. It is ne
Just do it (as Nike would say)!
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Merci beaucoup Luc,
> IIUC the general consensus shown in the previous thread should be
> enough to start working on the sandbox, right?
> Bonne soirée,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> h
Merci beaucoup Luc,
IIUC the general consensus shown in the previous thread should be
enough to start working on the sandbox, right?
Bonne soirée,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 11/06/2011 14:08, S
Le 11/06/2011 14:08, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
@James: sure, Meiyo ATM is just an alias of this initial codebase, we
still have to find a general consensus if it has to be released as a
proper component or including different parts to different existing
components
@Christian: I thought so, also f
@James: sure, Meiyo ATM is just an alias of this initial codebase, we
still have to find a general consensus if it has to be released as a
proper component or including different parts to different existing
components
@Christian: I thought so, also for other Sandbox proposals I used to
call for a
> [X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
> [ ] +/-0
> [ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
Interesting project, but is a vote really necessary?
As far as I know you wrote it alone, so you could simply drop it into
the sandbox? I have asked the same b/c I wrote a JSON lib on
+1 - I don't think I'd call it "meiyo", though.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
> about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
> spare time to dedicate to oss :D
Hi all guys,
after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
spare time to dedicate to oss :D ) to accept Meiyo as a new component
in Sandbox.
I already sent the signed SoftwareGrant to secretary@ and this m
11 matches
Mail list logo
