Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

+1 On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Julien Aymé wrote: > +1 > > Julien > > 2009/11/8 Dan Fabulich : > > > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > > > In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing > FindBugs > > errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

+1 Julien 2009/11/8 Dan Fabulich : > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs > errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. > > As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, >

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

+1 Oliver Dan Fabulich schrieb: This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, but I'm sti

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

Dan Fabulich a écrit : > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing > FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. There is a new (very minor) checkstyle error in this version. This is not blocking. +1 Luc

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

+1 Dan Fabulich wrote: > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs > errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. > > As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible > binary, but I'm

[VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, but I'm still only 99% sure of this; clirr rep