I'd suggest marking it volatile or making it an immutable property. the
overhead incurred from enforcing thread safety i think is a bit much for the
specific purpose of the QueryRunner -- in all the instances that you
mentioned -- it's the datasource that should be dispatched to threads not
the qu
On 15/03/2009, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>
> > OK, I'd not noticed that the class was usable without the DataSource.
> >
> > Of course the alternative is to document the class as thread-unsafe...
> >
>
> I would guess that the reason we've never seen a bug filed on this issue is
> that
sebb wrote:
OK, I'd not noticed that the class was usable without the DataSource.
Of course the alternative is to document the class as thread-unsafe...
I would guess that the reason we've never seen a bug filed on this issue
is that nobody uses setDataSource after the class is created. For
+1, all tests pass now also on IBM JDK 6.
Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> My second attempt at releasing a commons project; please be gentle. :-)
>
> RC2 includes sebb's patches that make numerous instance variables
> immutable.
>
> NOTE: No one has yet explicitly said on-list that they have tested Db
On 11/03/2009, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>
> > Sorry, my last e-mail mentioned that QueryRunner was not thread-safe,
> > but I did not provide a patch.
> >
>
> Dang; I skimmed through other classes looking for unsafe members but
> overlooked your main point.
>
>
> > Or you could change
sebb wrote:
Sorry, my last e-mail mentioned that QueryRunner was not thread-safe,
but I did not provide a patch.
Dang; I skimmed through other classes looking for unsafe members but
overlooked your main point.
Or you could change the API further and insist that the DataSource is
provided a
Sorry, my last e-mail mentioned that QueryRunner was not thread-safe,
but I did not provide a patch.
The DataSource variable is protected.
To allow multi-threaded access, either the variable has to be made
volatile, or it has to be made private (i.e. an API change) and the
accessors need to be sy
My second attempt at releasing a commons project; please be gentle. :-)
RC2 includes sebb's patches that make numerous instance variables
immutable.
NOTE: No one has yet explicitly said on-list that they have tested DbUtils
1.2 RC1 or RC2 with a real database. We should not release it until