sebb wrote:
I think there are some problems with thread-safety.
Yikes! I didn't investigate very carefully the thread-safety claims of
these classes (again, not much has changed since 1.1) but I agree with
your assessment, now that I open my eyes and think about it.
In revision 752369 I i
I think there are some problems with thread-safety.
QueryRunner Javadoc says the class is thread-safe. However it has a
protected mutable variable DataSource which can also be set/got via
public methods. If one thread sets the variable, another may not see
the correct value, so the class is not th
Jörg Schaible wrote:
However, IBM JDK 6 fails here:
---
Test set: org.apache.commons.dbutils.QueryRunnerTest
---
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Err
sebb wrote:
-0.5 because the unit tests seem wrong.
I've incorporated your feedback in revision 752322. For the record, all
of those tests predate DbUtils 1.1; we haven't touched them in years.
I think these test changes are pretty minor; not worth an additional RC.
What do you think?
-
On 08/03/2009, Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> My first attempt at releasing a commons project; please be gentle. :-)
>
> Compatibility warning: This version is mostly a bugfix release, but to fix
> DBUTILS-31 we had to upgrade the JVM dependency from JDK 1.3 to JDK 1.4.
> Except for that, it is backwar
Hi Dan,
I've downloaded the src tar ball and tried to build the version with my
compiler zoo. It runs fine with all Sun JDKs, IcedTea6, Blackdown 1.4.2,
JRockit 1.4 and 1.5. As usual the build faisl for IBM JDK 1.4 and 1.5
because Maven fails itself on this versions. However, IBM JDK 6 fails here:
My first attempt at releasing a commons project; please be gentle. :-)
Compatibility warning: This version is mostly a bugfix release, but to fix
DBUTILS-31 we had to upgrade the JVM dependency from JDK 1.3 to JDK 1.4.
Except for that, it is backwards compatible with DbUtils 1.1.
PLEASE TEST
