+1,
works fine now also for the IBM JDKs.
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC2:
>
> * Added missing slf4j binding which caused test failures with IBM JDKs
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/3/1 sebb :
> > On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
> >> On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> >>> +1, looks good.
> >>>
> >>> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
> >>> download p
2013/3/1 sebb :
> On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>> +1, looks good.
>>>
>>> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
>>> download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
>>> but
Le 27/02/2013 22:37, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC2:
>
> * Added missing slf4j binding which caused test failures with IBM JDKs
>
> The files:
>
> T
On 28 February 2013 21:26, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>> +1, looks good.
>>
>> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
>> download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
>> but the RAT report was compl
+1
2013/2/27 Thomas Neidhart :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC2:
>
> * Added missing slf4j binding which caused test failures with IBM JDKs
>
> The files:
>
> The artifacts are de
On 02/28/2013 10:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> +1, looks good.
>
> Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
> download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
> but the RAT report was complaining about it. This was not the case for
> the previous
+1, looks good.
Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
but the RAT report was complaining about it. This was not the case for
the previous RC.
Oliver
Am 27.02.2013 22:37, schrieb Thomas N
On 02/28/2013 03:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1
my own +1
@JIRA:
this is my output from running mvn site on the RC3 tag.
the JIRA plugin is not running at all, but I have seen it failing for
other components before, e.g. commons-math
my setup:
Apache Maven 3.0.2 (r1056850; 2011-01-09 01:58:1
+1
My set up:
Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.4\bin\..
Java version: 1.6.0_38, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_38\jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 7", version
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC3.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC2:
* Added missing slf4j binding which caused test failures with IBM JDKs
The files:
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus:
https://repository.apache.org/con
11 matches
Mail list logo
