Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hallo Thomas,
>
> o.a.c.email.util.MimeMessageUtils has very low test coverage. This may not
> be a blocker, but we should provide some more coverage for that class.
In general, yes, but this is a bug fix release.
Cheers,
Jörg
-
Hallo Thomas,
o.a.c.email.util.MimeMessageUtils has very low test coverage. This may not
be a blocker, but we should provide some more coverage for that class.
Regards,
Benedikt
2013/2/23 Thomas Neidhart
> On 02/22/2013 01:11 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote
On 02/22/2013 01:11 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC1.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.3:
>
> == Fixed Bugs ==
>
> * DataSourceClassPathResolver will now correctly set the DataSource
>
On 02/22/2013 02:00 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Shouldn't the Clirr report compare to 1.3 instead of 1.2?
Good question, for a point release I would think it makes sense to
compare to the same version as for the release it aims to fix.
But if usually the last released version is used, then we shoul
Shouldn't the Clirr report compare to 1.3 instead of 1.2?
Gary
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC1.
>
> This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.3:
>
> == Fixed Bugs ==
>
>
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC1.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to 1.3:
== Fixed Bugs ==
* DataSourceClassPathResolver will now correctly set the DataSource
name for resolved resources. Additionally, it is now possible to s
