RESULT: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

This vote has passed with +1 votes from Luc Maisonobe * Niall Pemberton * Henri Yandell * Bill Barker * Jörg Schaible * Sebastian Bazley * Phil Steitz * Dimitri Pourbaix Michael Heuer and no other votes. Thanks to all who helped prepare, review and improve this release! Phil * = Commons PMC -

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

> Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ > > Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ > > Maven artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ > > Documentation bundled with the binary distribution: > http://people.

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled with the binary distribution: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Phil Steitz wrote: > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ > > Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ > > Maven artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ > > Documentation bundled with the binary distribut

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

On 30/03/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > Jörg Schaible a écrit : > >> Hi Dimitri, > >> > >> Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit > 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Jörg Schaible a écrit : >> Hi Dimitri, >> >> Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be provided with the build or with

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Jörg Schaible a écrit : > Hi Dimitri, > > Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit >>> 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be >>> provided with the build or with Ant? >> When I was updating SV

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Jorg, > >> With Ant 1.7.0 all tests pass for me also. It seems that Ant 1.6.5 simply >> does not yet support JUnit 4.x OOTB. > > Are we supposed to guarantee backward compatibility that old? No. However, it might be good to add an echo task explaining that the JUnit 4

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Jorg, With Ant 1.7.0 all tests pass for me also. It seems that Ant 1.6.5 simply does not yet support JUnit 4.x OOTB. Are we supposed to guarantee backward compatibility that old? Regards, Dim. Dimitri Pourbaix

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Jorg, > >>> When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x >>> syntax >>> whereas other 4.x (way easier to use I think). I would advocate for the >>> generalisation of Junit 4.x tests whenever possible. >> >> Well, I think no one is aga

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Jorg, When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x syntax whereas other 4.x (way easier to use I think). I would advocate for the generalisation of Junit 4.x tests whenever possible. Well, I think no one is against this, unless somebody does the work ;-) However, this i

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Hi, > >> I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit >> 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be >> provided with the build or with Ant? > > When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tes

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi, I checked one of the tests and I assume that all of the above are JUnit 4.x tests ...? My Ant/lib contains only JUnit 3.8.x. Should JUnit 4.x be provided with the build or with Ant? When I was updating SVD, I noticed that parts of the tests were 3.x syntax whereas other 4.x (way easier to

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] >> Running the source distribution through my compiler zoo. JRockit 1.5 >> fails still >> (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/109929/focus=109945), >> but we agreed already last time to ignore that. Building with A

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ >> >> Distributions: >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ >> >> Maven artifacts: >> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ > > Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ > > Maven artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ > > Documentation bundled with the binar

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

+1 to the release. Release notes look good, pgp/md5/source-builds all check out. I think Niall's question below should be better addressed in the text in trunk, either by removing the Google entry in NOTICE as we have a license to the ASF to distribute, or add an item to the LICENSE file; but I do

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

-- From: "Phil Steitz" Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:31 PM To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3 Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Niall Pemberton a écrit : > Everything looks good except I have one question about the > LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software > developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't > see anything related to that in the LICENSE file - what license is

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Everything looks good except I have one question about the > LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software > developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't > see anything related to that in th

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Everything looks good except I have one question about the LICENSE/NOTICE files - in the NOTICE file it says it includes software developed by Benjamin McCann which is copyright Google - but I don't see anything related to that in the LICENSE file - what license is/was that code? Niall On Sun, Ma

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Phil Steitz a écrit : > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ > > Distributions: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ > > Maven artifacts: > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ > > Documentation bundled with the binary distri

[VOTE] Release math 2.1 based on RC3

Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_1_RC3/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-2.1-RC3/maven/ Documentation bundled with the binary distribution: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/