This vote passes, with +1 votes from
Gary Gregory
Oliver Heger
Emmanuel Bourg
and no other votes that I observed.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 14/04/2016 17:41, Benson Margulies a écrit :
>
>> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
>
> Tested on Debian with OpenJDK 8.
Le 14/04/2016 17:41, Benson Margulies a écrit :
> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
Tested on Debian with OpenJDK 8. The API changes look ok.
Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
What happened with this vote now?
Benson Margulies wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
[snip]
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after
> 0400 GMT 31-March 2010
No chance to vote before this da
Build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 14.04.2016 um 17:41 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/com
I've now corrected the binaries.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:19 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 April 2016 at 16:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>>
>> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/com
I missed the binaries. I will upload them.
On Apr 15, 2016 3:33 PM, "Oliver Heger"
wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> when checking the RC I get a pretty strange effect on downloading the
> binaries from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/binaries/:
>
> The browser shows me "dist - Revision 1
Hi Benson,
when checking the RC I get a pretty strange effect on downloading the
binaries from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/binaries/:
The browser shows me "dist - Revision 13260: /dev/commons/io/binaries".
However, the downloaded artifacts are obviously the ones from the
pre
On 14 April 2016 at 16:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 13247)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://reposito
The CONTRIBUTING.md and README.md files are present in the tag, but
are missing from the source archive.
Since they are intended mainly for GitHub - and they are generated -
that's not a blocker.
But it might make checking future releases easier if the files were included.
On 14 April 2016 at 22
On 14 April 2016 at 16:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 13247)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://reposito
+1
MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.
The site does not build on Java 7 and 8 due to a known issue with Maven
3.3.9 and maven-site-plugin and SLF4J (everybody should switch to Log4j 2
IMO).
Tested OK with: 'mvn clean site' on Maven 3.0.5 and:
Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-
Yep, Clirr report looks good. Thank you for addressing this so quickly! :-)
Gary
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> I've put up repaired doc.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > I think I know what happened to CLIRR.
> >
> > I'll push n
I've put up repaired doc.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I think I know what happened to CLIRR.
>
> I'll push new staged doc soon.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Th
I think I know what happened to CLIRR.
I'll push new staged doc soon.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> > Hm, we might also have Checkstyle misconf
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > Hm, we might also have Checkstyle misconfigured since it complains
> > about "Missing
> > a Javadoc comment." on a private method. That seems a bit much IMO.
>
> presumably that
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hm, we might also have Checkstyle misconfigured since it complains
> about "Missing
> a Javadoc comment." on a private method. That seems a bit much IMO.
presumably that's not something new that need to be fixed for 2.5.
>
> Gary
>
> On Th
1. I copied the entire site, using the mirror -R command of lftp. I
guess I'll try harder after we sort out CLIRR.
2. Can you tell me how to fix the clirr report? I don't see any CLIRR
config in the pom that seems relevant to the problem at hand. The
clirr config in the parent pom does not consume
Hm, we might also have Checkstyle misconfigured since it complains
about "Missing
a Javadoc comment." on a private method. That seems a bit much IMO.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials ar
Did you did not copy the whole site? Checkstyle links are broken.
For example on page
http://people.apache.org/~bimargulies/commons-io-2.5-RC4/checkstyle.html
the link to line 313 is broken:
http://people.apache.org/~bimargulies/commons-io-2.5-RC4/xref/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/io/output/Wr
The Clirr report is wrong, it should compare to 2.4. One cannot assess if
we broke BC from this report.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
> https://dis
Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 13247)
Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1174/org/apach
I built this wrong.
Please consider this vote [CANCELLED]; I'll try again and post another
vote. I misunderstood the web page the first time about how you deal
with RC status and the maven-release-plugin.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I'm working on moving the stuff
I'm working on moving the stuff to dist.
I'm working on 'home'.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 April 2016 at 12:42, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
>> since Commons IO 2.4 was released,
>> so I would lik
On 12 April 2016 at 12:42, Benson Margulies wrote:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Commons IO 2.4 was released,
> so I would like to release Commons IO 2.5.
>
> NOTE: because this is just an RC, and because I'm not a PMC member,
> I'm pointing to
On 12 April 2016 at 12:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/04/2016 12:42, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
>> since Commons IO 2.4 was released,
>> so I would like to release Commons IO 2.5.
>>
>> NOTE: because this is just an RC, and b
On 12/04/2016 12:42, Benson Margulies wrote:
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Commons IO 2.4 was released,
> so I would like to release Commons IO 2.5.
>
> NOTE: because this is just an RC, and because I'm not a PMC member,
> I'm pointing to the re
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
since Commons IO 2.4 was released,
so I would like to release Commons IO 2.5.
NOTE: because this is just an RC, and because I'm not a PMC member,
I'm pointing to the release on Nexus rather than copying it to dist.
If this is
27 matches
Mail list logo
