Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-12-10 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Kristian, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > The Charset related tests fail due some character set that is installed in > your environment that is nor present in mine (commons.io builds fine on > IBM jdk6 & 7 here). To try to identify which character set we're talking > about I added the name to the

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-12-09 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
The Charset related tests fail due some character set that is installed in your environment that is nor present in mine (commons.io builds fine on IBM jdk6 & 7 here). To try to identify which character set we're talking about I added the name to the assert message; there is already logic in place i

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-28 Thread sebb
On 28 November 2015 at 20:13, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/28/15 12:02 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Are you saying that the jar in the bin zip includes classes that are instrumented for use with Cobert

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-28 Thread Phil Steitz
On 11/28/15 12:02 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> >>> On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>> Are you saying that the jar in the bin zip includes classes that are >>> instrumented for use with Cobertura? If so, that would be a -1 indeed. >>> >> Yes, looks lik

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-28 Thread Jörg Schaible
Phil Steitz wrote: > > > >> On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> Are you saying that the jar in the bin zip includes classes that are >> instrumented for use with Cobertura? If so, that would be a -1 indeed. >> > Yes, looks like it. New need to find a way to get rid of this

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-27 Thread Phil Steitz
> On Nov 27, 2015, at 7:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Are you saying that the jar in the bin zip includes classes that are > instrumented for use with Cobertura? If so, that would be a -1 indeed. > Yes, looks like it. New need to find a way to get rid of this thing in cp or whatever is dragg

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-27 Thread Gary Gregory
Are you saying that the jar in the bin zip includes classes that are instrumented for use with Cobertura? If so, that would be a -1 indeed. Gary On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Sigs, hashes, contents look good except for dreaded error below. > Ant and maven build works fin

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-27 Thread Phil Steitz
Sigs, hashes, contents look good except for dreaded error below. Ant and maven build works fine on OSX 1.7. Did not test 1.6 or 1.8 yet because of two blockers 1. The binary jar appears to have the dreaded Coberta disease. When I hack the ant build to run the tests against the release jar, I ge

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant > enhancements since commons-io was released, > so I would like to release commons-io 2.5 > > Foo 2.5 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revisio

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-25 Thread Adrian Crum
I had the same maven errors while working on IO-487, but I assumed it was because my local copy was not set up correctly. The TailerTest fails intermittently with or without Cobertura. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 11/24/2015 5:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: Just to

[VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1 - Cancelled

2015-11-24 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Thanks for the reviews, I'll fix the reported problems and respin! the test failure on java8 site looks weird, I'll look into that. As for actually publishing the site on java8, I'd have to switch to the google BCEL to fix that. I'm assuming we can just "not support" this for the time being ? Kr

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Just to add to Java 8 woes, running "mvn clean site", I get: [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 08:01 min [INFO] Finished at: 2015-11

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-24 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Kristian, while checking the release I found some problems: * The commons-io-2.5.jar in the binary distribution contains a cobertura.properties file. This is probably created by running the site build over the release build before creating the distributions. In the past we had a problematic re

[VOTE] Release commons-io 2.5 based on RC1

2015-11-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements since commons-io was released, so I would like to release commons-io 2.5 Foo 2.5 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 11266) Maven artifacts are here: