On 29/12/2008, at 1:08 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
In short:
1. New projects should use org.apache.commons
Yep, that's why I started commons-exec with o.a.commons as the group.
I think it would be best to use that given the opportunity since there
are no prior releases under commons-exec.
Ch
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The "correct" groupId with respect to what Maven recommends should be
> org.apache.commons. However, if a groupId is changed and the package names
> are not changed at the same time it will cause nothing but grief for users
> of the project.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> IMO ...
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
>> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ...
>>>
>>> +) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)
The "correct" groupId with respect to what Maven recommends should be
org.apache.commons. However, if a groupId is changed and the package
names are not changed at the same time it will cause nothing but grief
for users of the project. This is because to maven commons-
exec:commons-exec:1.
Hi folks,
can we get an agreement on that and put it into the wiki? If using
"org.apache.commons.*" makes life easier I'm happy to use it but we
should have a common understanding first ...
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
"As Thomas Hobbes observed in the 17th century, life under mob rule is
solita
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> IMO ...
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ...
>>
>> +) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)
>> +) two positive comments (Rahul, Oliver) which formally do not
>
IMO ...
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ...
>
> +) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)
> +) two positive comments (Rahul, Oliver) which formally do not
> constitute a +1
>
> Having said th
Hi folks,
after more than one week I have to announce that the vote DID NOT PASS ...
+) two +1 votes (Jörg, Sebastian)
+) two positive comments (Rahul, Oliver) which formally do not
constitute a +1
Having said that a couple of issues were raised ...
1) [major] what is the correct groupId - "org
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>> All looks good except for the folder name used in the source distribution:
>> "commons-exec-2.4.1-src". I think this is caused by a Maven bug, I've seen
>> this before...
>>
>
>
> Ha
On 16/12/2008, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> after struggling with my and Maven's shortcomings (and wasting a release
> candidate) it is time to call a vote to release commons-exec-1.0.0
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/exec/tags/EXEC_1_0_0_RC2
>
Trivial
Hi Sierfried,
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> after struggling with my and Maven's shortcomings (and wasting a release
> candidate) it is time to call a vote to release commons-exec-1.0.0
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/exec/tags/EXEC_1_0_0_RC2
>
> Site:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> +) I will double-check since I have also seen the problem before
> +) would make a nice addition to the commons wiki
>
On item 2, absolutely, I think its atleast the 3rd RC bitten by this.
TIA for wiki update.
-Rahul
>
Hi Rahul,
+) I will double-check since I have also seen the problem before
+) would make a nice addition to the commons wiki
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>
>> All looks good except for the folder name used in the sou
Good point - I will add that tomorrow ...
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Oliver Heger wrote:
> All looks good except for the folder name used in the source
> distribution: "commons-exec-2.4.1-src". I think this is caused by a
> Maven bug, I've seen this before...
>
> Another point is that I was not a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> All looks good except for the folder name used in the source distribution:
> "commons-exec-2.4.1-src". I think this is caused by a Maven bug, I've seen
> this before...
>
Hardcoding version # in assembly source descriptor is perhaps the best
All looks good except for the folder name used in the source
distribution: "commons-exec-2.4.1-src". I think this is caused by a
Maven bug, I've seen this before...
Another point is that I was not able to find your public key for
verifying the signatures. It does not seem to be in KEYS [1].
Mostly OT with respect to vote, but might be useful for others to know
in this context ...
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> after struggling with my and Maven's shortcomings (and wasting a release
> candidate) it is time to call a vote to release commons-e
Hi folks,
after struggling with my and Maven's shortcomings (and wasting a release
candidate) it is time to call a vote to release commons-exec-1.0.0
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/exec/tags/EXEC_1_0_0_RC2
Site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/exec/1.0.0/RC2/site/
18 matches
Mail list logo