nicolas de loof wrote:
I also notice http://commons.apache.org/math/api-2.0/index.html is broken
Should work as soon as the replication runs
Phil
2009/8/7 Jörg Schaible
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote at Freitag, 7. August 2009 11:09:
- "Jörg Schaible" a écrit :
Hi Ph
I also notice http://commons.apache.org/math/api-2.0/index.html is broken
2009/8/7 Jörg Schaible
> luc.maison...@free.fr wrote at Freitag, 7. August 2009 11:09:
>
> >
> > - "Jörg Schaible" a écrit :
> >
> >> Hi Phil,
> >>
> >> why are there still 20 issues in JIRA marked as resolved instead
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote at Freitag, 7. August 2009 11:09:
>
> - "Jörg Schaible" a écrit :
>
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> why are there still 20 issues in JIRA marked as resolved instead of
>> closed
>> now?
>
> I forgot to close them, sorry.
> I'll do it in a few minutes.
No problem, it's simpl
- "Jörg Schaible" a écrit :
> Hi Phil,
>
> why are there still 20 issues in JIRA marked as resolved instead of
> closed
> now?
I forgot to close them, sorry.
I'll do it in a few minutes.
Luc
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310485&status=5
>
Hi Phil,
why are there still 20 issues in JIRA marked as resolved instead of closed
now?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310485&status=5
- Jörg
Phil Steitz wrote at Donnerstag, 6. August 2009 03:17:
> This vote has passed with no +-0 or -1 votes and +
This vote has passed with no +-0 or -1 votes and +1 votes from
Phil Steitz *
Niall Pemberton *
Bill Barker
Sebastian Bazley *
Luc Maisonobe *
Rahul Akolkar *
* = commons PMC
Thanks!
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
>
> - "Jörg Schaible" a écrit :
[snip]
>> > Could you try again to add the print and play with the costAccuracy
>> > setting ? This setting is a multiplicative factor for the printed
>> > threshold and this threshold is checked against the printed delta
>> whi
Just tried "mvn clean test" with
java version "1.6.0_11"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_11-b03)
BEA JRockit(R) (build
R27.6.3-40_o-112056-1.6.0_11-20090318-2104-windows-ia32, compiled
mode)
No errors reported.
On 04/08/2009, sebb wrote:
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jrockit/index.html
On 04/08/2009, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote:
> Luc,
>
>
> > I don't know jrockit, is it possible to install it freely as a
> > standalone JVM without oracle on a Linux host ?
> >
>
> In the past (about 2 years ago), it was freely available
Luc,
I don't know jrockit, is it possible to install it freely as a
standalone JVM without oracle on a Linux host ?
In the past (about 2 years ago), it was freely available as a standa-
lone JVM on Linux platform (faster than Sun for number crunching applica-
tions). I looked again one month
- "Jörg Schaible" a écrit :
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> > Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> >> Hi Luc,
> >>
> >> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Luc,
>
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> > Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> >> Hi Luc,
> >>
> [snip]
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>> Hi Luc,
>>
>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>>> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
Hi Luc,
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>> Hi Luc,
>>
[snip]
>> we're definitely on the right track. After changing the
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Luc,
>
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>>> Hi Luc,
>>>
>>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Luc,
>
>>> [snip]
>>>
> we're definitely on the right track. After changing the loop in
> TestProblem3 the tests r
Hi Luc,
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>> Hi Luc,
>>
>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>>> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
Hi Luc,
>> [snip]
>>
we're definitely on the right track. After changing the loop in
TestProblem3 the tests run through. However, now I have two faili
Phil Steitz wrote:
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Phil,
[snip]
>>> Fine by me, though it is annoying that we are forced to do this.
>>>
>>
>> Well, y
- "Phil Steitz" a écrit :
> Distributions are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/
>
> Tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC4/
>
> To reduce the size of the binary distribution and to eliminate broken
>
> links in th
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> ---
>
> [X] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1
>
> -
-Rahul
On 03/08/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 02/08/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Distributions are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/
> >
> > Tag is here:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC4/
>
>
> Sigs, hashes, contents all look OK.
>
On 02/08/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Distributions are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/
>
> Tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC4/
Sigs, hashes, contents all look OK.
Builds and tests OK on Java 1.5.
Out of curiosity
Phil Steitz wrote:
Distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/
Tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC4/
To reduce the size of the binary distribution and to eliminate broken
links in the html included in the distrib
+1
Niall
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Distributions are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/
>
> Tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC4/
>
> To reduce the size of the binary distribution and to elimin
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Artefacts look good, tests OK on JDK 1.5 and 1.6.
Was just wondering about the signed m2 artifacts?
Those will be identical to the jars in the binary distribution. I can
upload an i
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 1:26 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release math 2.0 (take two)
Distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/
Tag is here:
http://svn.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> Artefacts look good, tests OK on JDK 1.5 and 1.6.
>>
>> Was just wondering about the signed m2 artifacts?
>>
>
> Those will be identical to the jars in the binary distribution. I can
> upload an image of the m2 repo
Niall Pemberton wrote:
Artefacts look good, tests OK on JDK 1.5 and 1.6.
Was just wondering about the signed m2 artifacts?
Those will be identical to the jars in the binary distribution. I can
upload an image of the m2 repo directory including sigs, hashes, jars,
pom for inspection; but I
Artefacts look good, tests OK on JDK 1.5 and 1.6.
Was just wondering about the signed m2 artifacts?
Niall
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Distributions are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/
>
> Tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comm
Distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC4/
Tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC4/
To reduce the size of the binary distribution and to eliminate broken
links in the html included in the distribution, the pom and s
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Luc,
>
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>>> Hi Luc,
>>>
> [snip]
>
>>> we're definitely on the right track. After changing the loop in
>>> TestProblem3 the tests run through. However, now I have two failing
>>> tests:
>> The two tests are in fact t
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Phil,
Phil Steitz wrote:
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
Hi Phil,
one thing that also irritated me first was the directory layout. While
we do not necessarily follow the Maven conventions always (mainly
because of historical reasons) we
Hi Phil,
Phil Steitz wrote:
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> one thing that also irritated me first was the directory layout. While
>>> we do not necessarily follow the Maven conventions always (mainly
>>> because of historical reasons) we have in case
Hi Luc,
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>> Hi Luc,
>>
[snip]
>> we're definitely on the right track. After changing the loop in
>> TestProblem3 the tests run through. However, now I have two failing
>> tests:
>
> The two tests are in fact the same test repeated. The first occurr
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Luc,
>
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
>>> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
Hi Phil,
tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6
take roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes
about
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
Hi Phil,
one thing that also irritated me first was the directory layout. While we do
not necessarily follow the Maven conventions always (mainly because of
historical reasons) we have in case of math a mixture between Maven
conventions and histor
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Phil,
>
> one thing that also irritated me first was the directory layout. While we do
> not necessarily follow the Maven conventions always (mainly because of
> historical reasons) we have in case of math a mixture between Maven
> conventions and history.
>
> Maven e
Hi Phil,
one thing that also irritated me first was the directory layout. While we do
not necessarily follow the Maven conventions always (mainly because of
historical reasons) we have in case of math a mixture between Maven
conventions and history.
Maven encourages you to separate main and test
Hi Luc,
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
>> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6
>>> take roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes
>>> about 3 mins ... are math operations so bad
Phil Steitz wrote:
The release distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC3
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours (01:00 GMT 2-Aug-09)
Thanks!
Phil
Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
> Jörg Schaible a écrit :
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6 take
>> roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes about 3
>> mins ... are math operations so bad with this JVM? However, with JRockit
>>
Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Phil,
>
> tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6 take
> roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes about 3
> mins ... are math operations so bad with this JVM? However, with JRockit
> 1.5 the test hangs forever in
Hi Phil,
tried the source package with my compiler zoo. Sun JDKs and icedtea6 take
roughly 1 min to compile, test and build the jar. IBM JDK 1.6 takes about 3
mins ... are math operations so bad with this JVM? However, with JRockit
1.5 the test hangs forever in
org.apache.commons.math.ode.nonstiff
On 31/07/2009, Oliver Heger wrote:
> The artifacts look good, I found no specific problems. The user guide is
> great work!
>
> The only thing I found a bit strange is the size of the binary
> distribution: 16M is unusual for a small commons component. However, the
> size is caused to the major p
The artifacts look good, I found no specific problems. The user guide is
great work!
The only thing I found a bit strange is the size of the binary
distribution: 16M is unusual for a small commons component. However, the
size is caused to the major part by the API documentation and it should
On 31/07/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>
> > The release distributions are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/
SIgs and hashes OK; archives agree with each other and with SVN except
as noted below.
Builds and tests OK on Java 1.5/WinXP
> >
>
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> The release distributions are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/
>
> The tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC3
It seems I forgot to put the Apache header in the unit tests for
Mersenne twister.
I'
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:55 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0
The release distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/
The tag is here:
http://
The release distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC3
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours (01:00 GMT 2-Aug-09)
Thanks!
Phil
46 matches
Mail list logo
