Time & effort? :)
1.1 and 1.2 on Linux are painful too. Needs an old linux. Otherwise
you need a Windows machine, which I don't have a spare one of.
Hen
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri, why not setup Continuum to run all these jdk versions?
>
>
>
Henri, why not setup Continuum to run all these jdk versions?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Compiling against 1.2, we h
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 5:32 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> > package uses WeakHashMap's Map constructor. That wasn't added until
> > 1.3. Not that I could get
;
> > But 1.1 compatible? I doubt that. It seems like both should be 1.3.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL P
Gary Gregory skrev den 15-03-2008 02:08:
The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
http://garygregory.com/os/builds/commons-lang-2.4/index.html
In case you are interested the IBM JDK is available as part of their IBM
Developer package for Java.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jd
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Gary Gregory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Su
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 11:11 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
>
> Compiling against 1.2, we have only one inconsistency. The enums
> pa
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:32 AM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
> >
> > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delec
On 3/14/08, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The build looks good on all 9 SDKs I tested:
Ok, me browsing through the SVN tag now seems completely inadequate! :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/c
that. It seems like both should be 1.3.
Thoughts?
Thank you,
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:32 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lang 2.4 (RC2)
>
> Here's
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
> >
>
> Sigs etc are fine.
>
> Ant 1.6.5 and M
On 14/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
>
Sigs etc are fine.
Ant 1.6.5 and Maven 1.0.2 test OK using Java 1.3.1
> It's built from an export of
> https://svn.apac
I run JDK 1.6
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally gave up and asked on #maven. Turns out this is a 2.0.8 bug -
> ${version} + JDK 1.4 leaks the JVM property in and that just happens
> to be 2.4.1.
>
> Changing ${version} to ${project.version} should
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC2 for your delectation:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc2/
It's built from an export of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC2
and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
Note: The findbugs and cobertura re
Finally gave up and asked on #maven. Turns out this is a 2.0.8 bug -
${version} + JDK 1.4 leaks the JVM property in and that just happens
to be 2.4.1.
Changing ${version} to ${project.version} should have fixed it, but didn't.
Other options are:
* Pass in -Dversion=2.4 [this breaks Jetty, which
I checked out trunk and built myself and could not reproduce the
2.4.1version in any of my artifacts. Everything is
2.4.
Paul
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Strange Thing
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Strange Thing: The source distro unpacks to "commons-lang-2.4.1-src" -
> > don't know where the "2.4.1" version comes from - I re-built from your
> > 2.4 source distro and it created a source distro which unpacks
> > c
Strange Thing: The source distro unpacks to "commons-lang-2.4.1-src" -
don't know where the "2.4.1" version comes from - I re-built from your
2.4 source distro and it created a source distro which unpacks
correctly to "commons-lang-2.4-src".
Not sure whether thats a show stopper or not - going t
All looks good except for one minor nit and one strange thing:
Minor Nit: site.xml Javadoc version was missed (site.xml for m2 is
eqivalent of navigation.xml for m1) - I've fixed it in case theres
another RC:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=636713
Strange Thing: The source distro u
Here's the Lang 2.4 RC1 for your delectation:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/staging/commons-lang-2.4-rc1/
It's built from an export of
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4_RC1
and the Ant build built fine for me under JDK 1.3.
Note: The findbugs and cobertura r
21 matches
Mail list logo
