--- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson a écrit :
>
> > Well, apparently I'm going to try another RC
> anyway...
> > but the really cool thing about Commons is that
> the
> > various committers can kick in here and there
> across
> > components if they like, for example if on
Matt Benson a écrit :
Well, apparently I'm going to try another RC anyway...
but the really cool thing about Commons is that the
various committers can kick in here and there across
components if they like, for example if one committer
was completely Maven-illiterate and another committer
wanted
Due to some minor issues that have been found with
RC1, this vote is cancelled. Thanks for playing!
-Matt
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
> overdue 1.3 release!
>
> The artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpat
--- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson a écrit :
>
> > I confess it doesn't really bother me, here nor on
> the
> > recently released [lang] 2.4 API docs... ;) But
> maybe
> > the concept warrants further discussion for
> possible
> > inclusion in the parent POM.
>
> I con
Matt Benson a écrit :
I confess it doesn't really bother me, here nor on the
recently released [lang] 2.4 API docs... ;) But maybe
the concept warrants further discussion for possible
inclusion in the parent POM.
I confess I screamed when I saw the Lang 2.4 docs ;) Maybe the parent
POM could
On 4/30/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30/04/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/24/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
> > > overdue 1.3 release!
> > >
> > > The artifacts are here:
> > > ht
On 30/04/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/24/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
> > overdue 1.3 release!
> >
> > The artifacts are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc1/
> >
>
>
>
> A
--- Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/24/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
> > overdue 1.3 release!
> >
> > The artifacts are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc1/
> >
>
>
> Artifacts, sums
On 4/24/08, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
> overdue 1.3 release!
>
> The artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc1/
>
Artifacts, sums and sigs I checked look OK, source builds.
Minor:
* Copyright in no
Apologies for not having included the cute little
voting boxes in the original message. I'm taking this
opportunity to cast my own +1 vote and to implore
another Commons dev to have a look and cast a vote, if
anybody has the time. :)
-Matt
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At long
--- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson a écrit :
> > --- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The javadoc is not linked to the externals
> javadocs
> >> (Java, JDOM,
> >> BeanUtils, JEE)
> >
> > Is that a -1, or just an "ugh"? :)
>
> It's up to you :) I fee
Matt Benson a écrit :
--- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The javadoc is not linked to the externals javadocs
(Java, JDOM,
BeanUtils, JEE)
Is that a -1, or just an "ugh"? :)
It's up to you :) I feel it's important to have a javadoc that is
pleasant to read, seeing fully qualifi
--- Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The javadoc is not linked to the externals javadocs
> (Java, JDOM,
> BeanUtils, JEE)
Is that a -1, or just an "ugh"? :)
-Matt
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
>
>
> Matt Benson a écrit :
> > At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
> > overdu
Artifacts look good, build works in all variants on JDK 1.6. I tested
the new 1.3 jar with configuration and all tests succeeded.
So +1 from me.
Some minor remarks:
- When building with ant the resulting jar does not contain license and
notice. But I think, this is not a problem because ant is
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Adam Retter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if this project is still active? I
> > have posted to the
> > mailing list twice now and received no response?
>
> Hi, Adam. JXPath is in "maintenance mode."
To be more specific, "
--- Adam Retter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if this project is still active? I
> have posted to the
> mailing list twice now and received no response?
Hi, Adam. JXPath is in "maintenance mode." I will
try to make an intelligent response to your earlier
post.
-Matt
>
> Thank
I was wondering if this project is still active? I have posted to the
mailing list twice now and received no response?
Thanks Adam.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
> overdue 1.3 release!
>
> The artifa
The javadoc is not linked to the externals javadocs (Java, JDOM,
BeanUtils, JEE)
Emmanuel Bourg
Matt Benson a écrit :
At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
overdue 1.3 release!
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc1/
The tag is here:
http://sv
At long last JXPath is ready for its indescribably
overdue 1.3 release!
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc1/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_3_RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~mbenson/jxpath-1.3-rc1/site
19 matches
Mail list logo