Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/17/2010 06:40 PM, sebb wrote: The purpose of multiple archives is to allow users to choose their preferred unarchiver. It therefore follows that the presumption that the files in zip archives must have LF line endings is wrong. Nope. It presumes that the sources will be buildable

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-17 Thread sebb
On 17/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 03/17/2010 04:56 PM, sebb wrote: > > > On 17/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > > > > > > > > But that is exactly how it's done now. > > > Please double check the .zip file. Windows dir *has* DOS line endings. > > > > > > > But the N&L files don't have DOS EOLs

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/17/2010 04:56 PM, sebb wrote: On 17/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: But that is exactly how it's done now. Please double check the .zip file. Windows dir *has* DOS line endings. But the N&L files don't have DOS EOLs. Presumption that .zip file MUST be targeted for windows and thus

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-17 Thread sebb
On 17/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 03/17/2010 12:26 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > > > > > > -1. .zip is usable on platforms having broken tar like Solaris. > > > The files in windows/directory have CRLF > > > > > > > Seems to me that this is penalising Windows users for bugs on other OSes. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-17 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/17/2010 12:26 PM, sebb wrote: -1. .zip is usable on platforms having broken tar like Solaris. The files in windows/directory have CRLF Seems to me that this is penalising Windows users for bugs on other OSes. Having the wrong EOLs on Windows makes it difficult to read the text files

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-17 Thread sebb
On 16/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 03/16/2010 05:22 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > > The KEYS file is a bit old, but I assume it won't actually be used. > > > > Also, the source/ directory still has the 1.0.2 version in it, which > > confused me a bit. > > > > > > This has nothing to do with a relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-16 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: "Mladen Turk" Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:45 AM To: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2 On 03/16/2010 07:17 PM, ebb wrote: There's a problem with the Manifests in the source and javadoc j

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-16 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/16/2010 07:17 PM, ebb wrote: There's a problem with the Manifests in the source and javadoc jars. They have: Implementation-Vendor-Id: commons-daemon but that should be: Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache This is really getting annoying. I really don't wish to do another release ju

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-16 Thread sebb
On 16/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 03/16/2010 05:22 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > > The KEYS file is a bit old, but I assume it won't actually be used. > > > > Also, the source/ directory still has the 1.0.2 version in it, which > > confused me a bit. > > > > > > This has nothing to do with a relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-16 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/16/2010 05:22 PM, sebb wrote: -1 I think the packaging needs to be improved. Ping. Have you read my comments? Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-m

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-16 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/16/2010 05:22 PM, sebb wrote: The KEYS file is a bit old, but I assume it won't actually be used. Also, the source/ directory still has the 1.0.2 version in it, which confused me a bit. This has nothing to do with a release. It's a folder README. fixed anyhow The source/ dir also ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-16 Thread sebb
In 16/03/2010, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > Calling this again due to a typo and > removing site and dormant subcomponents from the > source distribution. > > We had 1.0.2 release last month and now 1.0.3 solves > few minor bug fixes and adds couple of new features. > Some of the old files n

[VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC2

2010-03-16 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Calling this again due to a typo and removing site and dormant subcomponents from the source distribution. We had 1.0.2 release last month and now 1.0.3 solves few minor bug fixes and adds couple of new features. Some of the old files not having ASL license header were updated, although some