After receiving some more votes, the vote to release Configuration 2.1
based on RC3 is now successful with the following votes (binding votes
marked with a *):
Gary Gregory: -1 *
Jörg Schaible: +1 *
Oliver Heger: +1 *
Raviteja Lokineni: +1
Benedikt Ritter: +1 *
Thanks for all revi
A vote is normally at least 72 hours, but it can be shorter if announced in
advanced, for a security fix for example.
I do not see a problem with saying that the additional binding vote counts.
You can send another vote result email.
Gary
On Aug 18, 2016 12:48 PM, "Oliver Heger"
wrote:
>
> Am
Am 16.08.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
> following binding votes:
>
> Gary Gregory: -1
> Jörg Schaible:+1
> Oliver Heger: +1
After closing the vote, two more votes have been cast:
- Raviteja Lokineni: +1 (non-bind
Hello Oliver,
Sorry that it took me so long.
+1 for this release. The problems with Java 1.6 have been resolved. Good
work!
When building with Java 9 EA the build fails. I think we need to
investigate this for all our components soon.
Benedikt
Oliver Heger schrieb am Do., 11. Aug. 2016
um 22:
If it's a majority win vote and if my vote counts +1 from me too.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> You can wait and ask for more reviews too...
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger <
> oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
> > wrote:
>
> > The vote to release
You can wait and ask for more reviews too...
Gary
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
> following binding votes:
>
> Gary Gregory: -1
> Jörg Schaible: +1
> Oliver Heger: +1
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 11.08.2016 u
The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
following binding votes:
Gary Gregory: -1
Jörg Schaible: +1
Oliver Heger: +1
Oliver
Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has
+1
Oliver
Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
> problems on Java 1.6.
>
> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst
wrote:
> Am 13.08.2016 um 21:37 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> > a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.
> >
> > b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
> > a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and
Am 13.08.2016 um 21:37 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> a) Accept the RC as is and ignore this issue.
>
> b) Add a note to the building documentation that the site build requires
> a minimum JDK of 1.7. This is a change of the site and does not require
> another RC.
+1 for a or b.
Regards
Dennis
-
Builds from src tarball with my compiler zoo:
+1
Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
> problems on Java 1.6.
>
> Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available f
A -1 does not block a release.
All I ask is for this oddity unique to this build to be documented properly
in the download. I am AFK so I am not sure if we even have a BUILDING.txt
in the root of the src zip, which where I look for this kind of
information. Or in the RELEASE-NOTES.txt.
The pain o
Am 13.08.2016 um 22:29 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> I would support another RC that clearly documents what the requirements are
> for different parts of the build.
And what would make the big difference to adapted documentation on the side?
Gary, I fail to understand your motivation. In the past you
I would support another RC that clearly documents what the requirements are
for different parts of the build.
Then IMO we should switch trunk to Java 7.
Gary
On Aug 13, 2016 12:37 PM, "Oliver Heger"
wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM,
Either ’a’ or ‘b’.
I’m all for anything that makes releasing easier.
+1 for requiring java 1.7 or 1.8 to build site
+1 (in general) for requiring java 1.7 or 1.8 to build artifacts, even if
project is targeted to 1.6, 1.5, etc.
chas
> On Aug 13, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>
>
Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst
> wrote:
>
>> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>> -1
>>>
>>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>>>
>>> Building with:
>>>
>>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf96
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst
wrote:
> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > -1
> >
> > From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
> >
> > Building with:
> >
> > Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
> 2013-02-19
> > 05:51:28-0800)
> > Maven home:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
>
>
> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > The error was building with 'mvn clean site'.
>
> Can you build the site successfully with a JDK >= 7?
>
Yes, the same command works, no surprise there.
Gary
>
> Oliver
>
> >
> > Gary
>
Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> -1
>
> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>
> Building with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
> 05:51:28-0800)
> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
> Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Am 12.08.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> The error was building with 'mvn clean site'.
Can you build the site successfully with a JDK >= 7?
Oliver
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
>> -1
>>
>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>>
>> Building with:
>
The error was building with 'mvn clean site'.
Gary
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> -1
>
> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
>
> Building with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
> 05:51:28-0800)
> Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-
-1
>From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK.
Building with:
Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
05:51:28-0800)
Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5
Java version: *1.6.0_45*, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: E:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre
Default loc
Hi all,
after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
has been further tweaking of the checkstyle configuration to solve build
problems on Java 1.6.
Configuration 2.1 RC3 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration
(revi
23 matches
Mail list logo
