Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-22 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 (Making my vote explicit.) Oliver Am 19.09.2014 um 22:45 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > this is a vote for the first alpha version of [configuration] 2.0 based > on the first release candidate. > > Please note the following points: > - This release is according to the "release often and

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-21 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 21.09.2014 um 01:44 schrieb sebb: > On 20 September 2014 20:22, Oliver Heger wrote: >> Hi Gary, >> >> thanks for your review. >> >> Am 20.09.2014 um 14:23 schrieb Gary Gregory: >>> I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do >>> as expected for an alpha. Importa

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread sebb
On 20 September 2014 20:22, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi Gary, > > thanks for your review. > > Am 20.09.2014 um 14:23 schrieb Gary Gregory: >> I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do >> as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM >> refers

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Gary, thanks for your review. Am 20.09.2014 um 14:23 schrieb Gary Gregory: > I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do > as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM > refers to a lot of old versions for jars. I would update those (Xer

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Thank you for keeping commons-configuration rolling Oliver. I'm +1 for the alpha release, I'll try to post my observations regarding the API in a separate thread. Emmanuel Bourg Le 19/09/2014 22:45, Oliver Heger a écrit : > Hi all, > > this is a vote for the first alpha version of [configuratio

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM refers to a lot of old versions for jars. I would update those (Xerces 2.6.2? Wow!) +1 Note that the CI build failed: https://continuum-ci.apache.org/c

[VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

2014-09-19 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi all, this is a vote for the first alpha version of [configuration] 2.0 based on the first release candidate. Please note the following points: - This release is according to the "release often and early" mantra. It is not yet perfect (e.g. there are lots of checkstyle errors, and it is expecte