IMO its confusing that the NET_1_5_0_RC3 tag was created from the
first incorrectly tagged NET_2_1_RC1 (especially since that original
tag has been removed and re-created). Better IMO to re-tag properly a
RC4 from trunk
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=796050
Niall
On Tue, Jul 21,
Hi folks
Been kicking around for a while:
Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0_RC3/
Binaries/sources etc: http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0-RC3/
+1
+0
-0
-1
Thanks
--Rory
-
T
iginal Message-
>
> > From: Rory Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Sent: Samstag, 08. März 2008 21:39
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5
> >
> > The functional tests seem to be broken r
al Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> -Original Message-
> From: Rory Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Samstag, 08. März 2008 21:39
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rel
: Dienstag, 11. März 2008 21:10
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [NET] fixing short date parsing problems (was:
> [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5)
>
> Sebb/Martin
>
> The lenient future dates flag just allows a window of +1 day in the
> short timestamp, wh
On 11/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebb/Martin
Martin and I agree on wanting the parser to return an FTPFile rather
than null for the cases where the date (etc ?) does not parse OK. I
would like to see this go into the next release of NET 1.5 and 2.0; I
think this will avoid
Sebb/Martin
The lenient future dates flag just allows a window of +1 day in the
short timestamp, which if > now(), will not be rolled back by a year.
This is to prevent dates slightly in the future being rolled back
inappropriately. You keep mentioning the +/- 6 month thing - the problem
is t
> Seems to me it would be a lot better if the FTPFile entry was still
> generated, but with a null date.
I agree.
In the past, commons net ftp has always been using strict parsing,
with the result that some files might have been missed. We have
also seen this on Solaris with certain devices which
On 10/03/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Sebb
> >
> > A couple of things:
> >
> > 1. Which tests are you referring to in your first point below?
>
>
> testFeb29IfLeapYear(org.apache.commons.net.ftp.parser.FTPTimestampParse
On 10/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sebb
>
> A couple of things:
>
> 1. Which tests are you referring to in your first point below?
testFeb29IfLeapYear(org.apache.commons.net.ftp.parser.FTPTimestampParserImplTest)
testFeb29LeapYear(org.apache.commons.net.ftp.parser.FTPTim
Hi Sebb
A couple of things:
1. Which tests are you referring to in your first point below?
2. Does the assumption have anything to do with the lenientFutureDates
flag in FTPTimestampParserImpl?
Rory
sebb wrote:
I've committed updates to the FTPTimestampParserImplTest classes in
trunk and NE
I've committed updates to the FTPTimestampParserImplTest classes in
trunk and NET_2_0.
The 2 additional tests for Feb 29 fail on Java 1.3/1.4.
Both trunk (Java 1.3/1.4) and NET_2_0 (Java 1.5+) now fail on short
dates that fall in a different year from current (previous or next).
Some of the exis
Sure, you can just add them directly yourself if you like.
Rory
The *nix short date formatting fixes don't currently have any tests,
at least when I last checked.
I think these need to be added first.
I can add some later today if that's OK with you?
Or do you want them done as patches via Jira
The *nix short date formatting fixes don't currently have any tests,
at least when I last checked.
I think these need to be added first.
I can add some later today if that's OK with you?
Or do you want them done as patches via Jira?
On 09/03/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jam
Hi James
Yes, I'm going to cut new RCs for 1.5 and 2.0.
Thanks
Rory
James Carman wrote:
On 3/8/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've taken into account the suggestions proposed by various people wrt
the TFTP server classes and accordingly made some changes. Thanks for
the fee
On 3/8/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've taken into account the suggestions proposed by various people wrt
> the TFTP server classes and accordingly made some changes. Thanks for
> the feedback.
>
So, does that mean you're cutting (or have already done so) a new
release candidat
I've taken into account the suggestions proposed by various people wrt
the TFTP server classes and accordingly made some changes. Thanks for
the feedback.
Rory
sebb wrote:
On 07/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTE
P PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
-Original Message-
From: Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 11:50
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5
Hi Rory,
it's great to hear some progress is being made towar
On 07/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/2/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes a few
> > > issues
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes a few
> > issues with TFTP errors, threading hangs, and a leap year date parsing
> bug.
>
On 3/2/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes a few
> issues with TFTP errors, threading hangs, and a leap year date parsing bug.
>
> The RC deployment is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/si
I have compiler errors:
/home/jbrekke/sandbox/other/net/src/test/org/apache/commons/net/tftp/TFTPTests.java:[33,8]
cannot find symbol
symbol : class TFTPServer
location: class org.apache.commons.net.tftp.TFTPTests
/home/jbrekke/sandbox/other/net/src/test/org/apache/commons/net/tftp/TFTPTests.jav
gt;
> > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 14:29
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5
> >
> > > > TFTPServer.java
> > > > SocketTimeoutException
DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 14:29
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5
ember
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 14:29
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5
>
> > > TFTPServer.java
> > >
ember
> > http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Oberhuber, Martin
> >
> >
> > > Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 12:57
> > > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List
-
> > From: Oberhuber, Martin
>
>
> > Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 12:57
> > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; 'Rory Winston'
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5
> >
> > Also, I get unit test failures in
> >
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> -Original Message-
> From: Oberhuber, Martin
> Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 12:57
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; 'Rory Winston'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.
Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> -Original Message-
> From: Oberhuber, Martin
> Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 11:50
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5
>
> Hi Ror
I've added source file headers to those that were missing and
corrected the ones which didn't conform to current policy (i.e. had
the Copyright notice):
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=633032
Also added the clirr report - and running the report says that 1.5 is
binary compatible wi
n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sonntag, 02. März 2008 22:40
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5
>
> Hi
>
> This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes a few
> issues with TFTP errors, threading hangs, and a
This distributiion has not been built from whats been tagged as
NET_1_5_0 in subversion - the pom.xml and issue-tracking.xml files are
different. Also the source distro contains files which are not in the
subversion repo (TFTPClient-1.4.1-fix.diff, TFTPClient.java.orig and
TFTPClient.java.rej) and
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes a few
issues with TFTP errors, threading hangs, and a leap year date parsing bug.
The RC deployment is here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5
Hi
This is a release vote for Commons Net 1.5. This release fixes a few
issues with TFTP errors, threading hangs, and a leap year date parsing bug.
The RC deployment is here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0/site/
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1
34 matches
Mail list logo
