On 5/13/11 6:50 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb wrote:
>>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
>>>
>>> [X] +1 release it
>>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
>>>
>>> tag: http://svn.apache.org
sebb wrote:
> On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb wrote:
>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
>>
>> [X] +1 release it
>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
>>
>> tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_0_RC1/
>> (
On 10 May 2011 15:13, sebb wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
>
> [X] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
>
> tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_0_RC1/
> (r1101459)
>
> site: htt
Am 11.05.2011 22:26, schrieb sebb:
On 11 May 2011 21:07, Oliver Heger wrote:
Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts and site look
good.
Minor nit: When I build the site on my local machine I get 64 findbugs
errors. These are not shown on the staged site. According to my
On 11 May 2011 21:07, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts and site look
> good.
>
> Minor nit: When I build the site on my local machine I get 64 findbugs
> errors. These are not shown on the staged site. According to my local
> findbugs report 572
Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts and site
look good.
Minor nit: When I build the site on my local machine I get 64 findbugs
errors. These are not shown on the staged site. According to my local
findbugs report 572 classes have been checked while the report on the
On 11 May 2011 16:15, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1.
>
> If there is another RC, please add a code coverage report.
>
> Shouldn't code coverage be part of the parent POM?
I suggest you file a JIRA so that does not get forgotten.
> Gary
>
> Looks good on:
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 1
+1.
If there is another RC, please add a code coverage report.
Shouldn't code coverage be part of the parent POM?
Gary
Looks good on:
Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 12:31:09-0500)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.3\bin\..
Java version: 1.6.0_24, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java
On 11 May 2011 10:02, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 10/05/2011 16:13, sebb a écrit :
>>
>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
>>
>> [ ] +1 release it
>
> +1
>
> I just noticed you didn't put yourself in the developers section of the pom
> file. With all the work you have do
Le 10/05/2011 16:13, sebb a écrit :
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
[ ] +1 release it
+1
I just noticed you didn't put yourself in the developers section of the
pom file. With all the work you have done, you should get some credit.
Luc
[ ] +0 go ahead I don
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0 based on RC1.
[ ] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_0_RC1/
(r1101459)
site: http://people.apache.org/~sebb/NET_3_0_RC1/
The Javado
11 matches
Mail list logo