Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This new vote is called because new binaries have been compiled.
> The source code is identical to what was used to generate the previous
> ones.
>
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC3/
>
> Site:
> http://people.
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:15:20AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I ran Cobertura and uploaded the result here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/math/cobertura
>
> It took more than 4 hours to complete on my Core 2 Duo, ouch!
Thanks for the effort! :-)
> At the
> end JavaNCSS complained abo
I ran Cobertura and uploaded the result here:
http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/math/cobertura
It took more than 4 hours to complete on my Core 2 Duo, ouch! At the end
JavaNCSS complained about the hexadecimal floating numbers in some
classes but it didn't prevent the report from being generate
+1
Successfully tested the ant and maven builds on JDK 1.5 on Windows 7.
Artifacts and site look good.
Oliver
Am 05.03.2012 11:43, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Hi.
This new vote is called because new binaries have been compiled.
The source code is identical to what was used to generate the prev
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:40:52PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 05/03/2012 08:57, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
> >
> > >There is indeed a plugin which is developed independently from the
> > >main Cober
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:40:52PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 05/03/2012 08:57, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
>
> >There is indeed a plugin which is developed independently from the
> >main Cobertura project [1]. However, my experience is that Cobertura
> >considerably slows down the unit tes
Le 05/03/2012 08:57, Sébastien Brisard a écrit :
There is indeed a plugin which is developed independently from the
main Cobertura project [1]. However, my experience is that Cobertura
considerably slows down the unit tests, which might be a problem for
us, as some of our tests can be quite invo
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> You can say -DskipTests but I do not know of a way to skip Cobertura only.
> It's the trade off of getting this report, Maven runs the test again under
> Cobertura. I use Eclipse to run all the tests in a given project and use
> Maven when I
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> How about adding a test coverage report (Cobertura) like a lot of other
> >> components do?
> >
> > There was one a long time ago. It was suppressed when we had concerns
> > about some GPL scripts used in the generated HTML rep
Hi Gilles,
and thanks again!
[X] +1 Release it.
[ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care.
[ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ...
[ ] -1 No, do not release it because ...
Best regards,
Sébastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This new vote is called because new binaries have been compiled.
> The source code is identical to what was used to generate the previous
> ones.
>
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons
Le 05/03/2012 11:43, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> This new vote is called because new binaries have been compiled.
> The source code is identical to what was used to generate the previous ones.
>
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC3/
>
> Sit
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 08:06:08PM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Sorry for the nitpicking, but the RAT report still shows missing Apache
> headers:
>
> - src/test/R/KolmogorovSmirnovDistributionTestCases.R
> - css files
>
> I've taken the liberty to fix those in SVN.
Thanks.
>
> There are low-h
Vote cancelled (see reason below).
New artifacts are available (cf. call to a new vote).
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:07:46AM +, sebb wrote:
> On 4 March 2012 19:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Please have a look at RC3. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Tag:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
Hi.
This new vote is called because new binaries have been compiled.
The source code is identical to what was used to generate the previous ones.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC3/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.0/RC3/
Binarie
Hi,
>> How about adding a test coverage report (Cobertura) like a lot of other
>> components do?
>
> There was one a long time ago. It was suppressed when we had concerns
> about some GPL scripts used in the generated HTML reports. The concerns
> have been solved later on but we failed to bring th
Hi Gary,
Le 05/03/2012 06:06, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> How about adding a test coverage report (Cobertura) like a lot of other
> components do?
There was one a long time ago. It was suppressed when we had concerns
about some GPL scripts used in the generated HTML reports. The concerns
have been s
How about adding a test coverage report (Cobertura) like a lot of other
components do?
Gary
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:07 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 4 March 2012 19:22, Gilles Sadowski
>> wrote:
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> > Please have a look at RC3. Tha
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:07 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 March 2012 19:22, Gilles Sadowski
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Please have a look at RC3. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Tag:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC3/
>
> Which is Revision: 1296853
>
> > Site:
> > http://pe
On 4 March 2012 19:22, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Please have a look at RC3. Thanks.
>
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC3/
Which is Revision: 1296853
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.0/RC3/
>
> Binaries:
> https://re
Sorry for the nitpicking, but the RAT report still shows missing Apache
headers:
- src/test/R/KolmogorovSmirnovDistributionTestCases.R
- css files
I've taken the liberty to fix those in SVN.
There are low-hanging fruits that should be fixed IMO as reported by PMD:
- No need to import a type tha
Le 04/03/2012 20:22, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> Please have a look at RC3. Thanks.
>
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC3/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.0/RC3/
>
> Binaries:
>
> https://repository.apache.
Hi.
Please have a look at RC3. Thanks.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC3/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.0/RC3/
Binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-052/org/apache/commons/commons-ma
Vote cancelled.
New tag being created...
Gilles
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The major problems (duplicate files, broken site) detected by Luc have been
> corrected (without necessitating a new tag).
> Only the Nexus link has changed below.
>
>
> T
Hi.
> > [...]
> >> There is still an old artifact in the jar:
> >>
> >>templates/math-release-notes.vm
> >>
> >> which comes from
> >>
> >>src/main/resources/templates/math-release-notes.vm
> >>
> >> The actual release notes are now generated from
> >>
> >>src/changes/release-notes.vm
Le 04/03/2012 16:10, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
> Le 04/03/2012 15:30, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 08:55:09AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> The RAT report complains about a couple of Java files.
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out (I had never looked at the RAT report...).
>>
The files are missing the Apache header.
Gary
On Mar 4, 2012, at 10:19, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 10:04:14AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> The RAT report still shows bad java files.
>
> Yes, I know; I didn't touch them because I don't how to completely solve the
> problem
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 10:04:14AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The RAT report still shows bad java files.
Yes, I know; I didn't touch them because I don't how to completely solve the
problem. I've asked for specific advice, in the other thread.
Thanks,
Gilles
--
On 03/04/2012 04:00 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 03:10:17PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 03/04/2012 03:35 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Please review the deliverables for Math 3.0.
>>
>> There is still an old artifact in the jar:
>>
>>templates/mat
Le 04/03/2012 15:30, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 08:55:09AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> The RAT report complains about a couple of Java files.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out (I had never looked at the RAT report...).
>
> These are the incriminated files:
> ---CUT---
>
The RAT report still shows bad java files.
Gary
On Mar 4, 2012, at 9:05, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The major problems (duplicate files, broken site) detected by Luc have been
> corrected (without necessitating a new tag).
> Only the Nexus link has changed below.
>
>
> Tag:
> https://svn
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 03:10:17PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 03:35 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Please review the deliverables for Math 3.0.
>
> There is still an old artifact in the jar:
>
>templates/math-release-notes.vm
>
> which comes from
>
>sr
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 08:55:09AM -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The RAT report complains about a couple of Java files.
Thanks for pointing this out (I had never looked at the RAT report...).
These are the incriminated files:
---CUT---
Unapproved licenses:
src/test/R/KolmogorovSmirnovDistributi
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The major problems (duplicate files, broken site) detected by Luc have been
> corrected (without necessitating a new tag).
> Only the Nexus link has changed below.
>
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/p
Hi.
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:25:00AM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 04/03/2012 03:35, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> > Hello.
> >
> > Please review the deliverables for Math 3.0.
> >
> > Tag:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC2/
> >
> > Site:
> > http
On 03/04/2012 03:35 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Please review the deliverables for Math 3.0.
There is still an old artifact in the jar:
templates/math-release-notes.vm
which comes from
src/main/resources/templates/math-release-notes.vm
The actual release notes are now genera
Vote cancelled.
Please refer to the new thread with subject:
"[VOTE] Release Commons Math 3.0 (RC2, take 2)"
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 03:35:43AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Please review the deliverables for Math 3.0.
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.
Hi.
The major problems (duplicate files, broken site) detected by Luc have been
corrected (without necessitating a new tag).
Only the Nexus link has changed below.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC2/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math
The RAT report complains about a couple of Java files.
Gary
On Mar 3, 2012, at 21:36, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Please review the deliverables for Math 3.0.
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC2/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/builds
Le 04/03/2012 03:35, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> Please review the deliverables for Math 3.0.
>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC2/
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.0/RC2/
>
> Binaries:
>
> https://reposito
Hello.
Please review the deliverables for Math 3.0.
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_0_RC2/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.0/RC2/
Binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-050/org/apache/common
41 matches
Mail list logo
