[RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-18 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi all, this vote passes with the following binding votes: Luc Maisonobe: -0 Gary Gregory: +1 Benedikt Ritter: +1 Matt Benson: +1 Luc discovered a failing test with an older JDK 6 (u30). This problem is not reproducible with the latest JDK 6 release (u65) or JDK7/JDK8 EA. So I do not consider th

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-17 Thread Matt Benson
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi all, > > we have introduced a bug in release 3.3 when we fixed LANG-951 [1]. This > has been reported a few days ago and fixed by Duncan Jones in LANG-987 [2]. > Since there is no work around for this bug and sebb has also fixed quite a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-17 Thread Benedikt Ritter
My +1 FTR 2014-03-15 14:22 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter : > Hi all, > > we have introduced a bug in release 3.3 when we fixed LANG-951 [1]. This > has been reported a few days ago and fixed by Duncan Jones in LANG-987 [2]. > Since there is no work around for this bug and sebb has also fixed quite a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-16 Thread Gary Gregory
FWIW I am fine with the new javadoc behavior. We should fix our sources soon. Not a blocker. Gary Original message From: Benedikt Ritter Date:03/16/2014 08:13 (GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1 Hello

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-16 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 16/03/2014 13:09, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Hello Luc > > > 2014-03-15 15:37 GMT+01:00 Luc Maisonobe : > >> Le 15/03/2014 14:22, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : >>> Hi all, >> >> Hi Benedikt. >> >> >> I have a test failure: >> >> Failed tests: >> >> FastDateParserTest.testParses:244->validateSdfF

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-16 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Gary, 2014-03-15 19:15 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory : > Not a blocker until Java 8 is released, but running 'mvn javadoc:javadoc' > fails on Java 8 (build 1.8.0-b132). > This is probably related to the changes Oracle made to the javadoc tool. I'm guessing that this will cause a lot of problems

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-16 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Luc 2014-03-15 15:37 GMT+01:00 Luc Maisonobe : > Le 15/03/2014 14:22, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > > Hi all, > > Hi Benedikt. > > > I have a test failure: > > Failed tests: > > FastDateParserTest.testParses:244->validateSdfFormatFdpParseEquality:220 > ja_JP Sat Feb 10 05:09:21 CET 1900 > GG

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-15 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Using: Apache Maven 3.2.1 (ea8b2b07643dbb1b84b6d16e1f08391b666bc1e9; 2014-02-14T12:37:52-05:00) Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.2.1\bin\.. Java version: 1.7.0_51, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_51\jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252 OS

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-15 Thread Gary Gregory
Not a blocker until Java 8 is released, but running 'mvn javadoc:javadoc' fails on Java 8 (build 1.8.0-b132). Gary On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi all, > > we have introduced a bug in release 3.3 when we fixed LANG-951 [1]. This > has been reported a few days ago a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-15 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 15/03/2014 14:22, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Hi all, Hi Benedikt. I have a test failure: Failed tests: FastDateParserTest.testParses:244->validateSdfFormatFdpParseEquality:220 ja_JP Sat Feb 10 05:09:21 CET 1900 //////ss/// America/New_York expected: but

[VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3.1 based on RC1

2014-03-15 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi all, we have introduced a bug in release 3.3 when we fixed LANG-951 [1]. This has been reported a few days ago and fixed by Duncan Jones in LANG-987 [2]. Since there is no work around for this bug and sebb has also fixed quite a few bugs in DurationFormatUtils, I'd like to push out a bug fix re