FYI: I'm heading out of town for the weekend so I am not sure I'll be able
to spin a new RC before I leave. Best case: new RC tonight, worst case: new
RC Monday.
Gary
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> This vote is canceled due to bugs, see IO-311 and IO-312. The lack of test
This vote is canceled due to bugs, see IO-311 and IO-312. The lack of test
coverage is to blame. Some of the new 2.2 methods had no test coverage.
Gary
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:52 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 March 2012 20:10, sebb wrote:
> > On 22 March 2012 19:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> On Ma
On 22 March 2012 20:10, sebb wrote:
> On 22 March 2012 19:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 15:19, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote:
>> Presumably you
On 22 March 2012 19:27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 15:19, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 22 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote:
> Presumably you have seen IO-311 ?
>
> -1 to proceedi
On Mar 22, 2012, at 15:19, sebb wrote:
> On 22 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote:
Presumably you have seen IO-311 ?
-1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolve
On 22 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote:
>> > Presumably you have seen IO-311 ?
>> >
>> > -1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolved
>> > as appropriate.
>>
>> I don't mean canc
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:24 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote:
> > Presumably you have seen IO-311 ?
> >
> > -1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolved
> > as appropriate.
>
> I don't mean cancel the release vote - at least not just yet - but the
>
On 22 March 2012 17:21, sebb wrote:
> Presumably you have seen IO-311 ?
>
> -1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolved
> as appropriate.
I don't mean cancel the release vote - at least not just yet - but the
issue needs to be evaluated before proceeding further with th
Presumably you have seen IO-311 ?
-1 to proceeding with release until this is investigated, and resolved
as appropriate.
On 21 March 2012 22:23, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Thomas Neidhart
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/18/2012 08:03 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Hello All:
>> >
>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> On 03/18/2012 08:03 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hello All:
> >
> > This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC3
> >
> > The changes from RC2 are:
> > - Remove macro from release notes
> > - Add binary compatibility to release notes
> > - In
On 03/18/2012 08:03 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC3
>
> The changes from RC2 are:
> - Remove macro from release notes
> - Add binary compatibility to release notes
> - Information in src/site/xdoc/upgradeto2_2.xml was missing
>
> The changes
My +1.
Gary
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC3
>
> The changes from RC2 are:
> - Remove macro from release notes
> - Add binary compatibility to release notes
> - Information in src/site/xdoc/upgradeto2_2.xml was mi
On 21 March 2012 16:22, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This vote's 72 hour mark will pass in a couple of hours. There has only
> been one vote (+1) so far.
Remember that the 72 hours is a minimum; not a maximum.
If it takes another day or two (or more) to gather the required votes,
that doe
Hello All:
This vote's 72 hour mark will pass in a couple of hours. There has only
been one vote (+1) so far.
Does anyone have any items that would cause an RC4 to be required? If I
missed something obvious in this thread to cancel the vote and make an RC4,
please remind me here.
Thank you,
Gary
On 20 March 2012 01:51, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:45 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 18 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Hello All:
>> >
>> > This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC3
>> >
>> > The changes from RC2 are:
>> > - Remove macro from release notes
>> > - Add
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:45 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hello All:
> >
> > This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC3
> >
> > The changes from RC2 are:
> > - Remove macro from release notes
> > - Add binary compatibility to release notes
> > - Information
On 18 March 2012 19:03, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC3
>
> The changes from RC2 are:
> - Remove macro from release notes
> - Add binary compatibility to release notes
> - Information in src/site/xdoc/upgradeto2_2.xml was missing
>
> The changes fr
+1
Build with my compiler zoo, IBM Java 6 fails as already reported
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-253
- Jörg
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC3
>
> The changes from RC2 are:
> - Remove macro from release notes
> - Add binary compatibi
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.2-RC3
The changes from RC2 are:
- Remove macro from release notes
- Add binary compatibility to release notes
- Information in src/site/xdoc/upgradeto2_2.xml was missing
The changes from RC1 are:
- Built from tag
- Update release notes with versi
19 matches
Mail list logo
