[RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-26 Thread Niall Pemberton
This vote has passed with four +1 votes from the following people: Jörg Schaible Oliver Heger Phil Steitz Niall Pemberton Thanks for reviewing the release and the votes. Niall On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-26 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 from me. Niall On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I > would like to release IO 2.0.1 > > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 > [ ] -1 No, because... > > IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-25 Thread Phil Steitz
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I > would like to release IO 2.0.1 > > [X ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 > [ ] -1 No, because... > > IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here: > > http://pe

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: >> Build (Maven and ant) works fine with Sun JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Site and >> artifacts look good. >> >> +1 >> >> Just one minor note: I noticed that the Findbugs report looks a bit s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Build (Maven and ant) works fine with Sun JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Site and > artifacts look good. > > +1 > > Just one minor note: I noticed that the Findbugs report looks a bit strange. > There is one error, but you do not see any details. Yes,

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Build (Maven and ant) works fine with Sun JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Site and artifacts look good. +1 Just one minor note: I noticed that the Findbugs report looks a bit strange. There is one error, but you do not see any details. Am 23.12.2010 05:15, schrieb Niall Pemberton: There have been a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Niall Pemberton wrote: > There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I > would like to release IO 2.0.1 > > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 > [ ] -1 No, because... > > IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.01.-rc1/

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
Apologies, IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0.1-rc1/ Niall On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I > would like to release IO 2.0.1 > > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead

[VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-22 Thread Niall Pemberton
There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I would like to release IO 2.0.1 [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 [ ] -1 No, because... IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.01.-rc1/ Maven artifacts are here: http://peop