On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-08-12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
...but anyway - let's give it another go?
>
>>> Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is 3 +1s and
>>> and one -1 which means it is one its way to pass.
>
>> Two voted -
On 2010-08-12, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> ...but I do think we should remove the dists from the maven repo and
> fix them to have the READMEs included. Not sure that makes it a full
> +1 or not :)
Looks as if Christian deems it important enough to re-roll, so let's
just do that.
Stefan
On 2010-08-12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> ...but anyway - let's give it another go?
>> Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is 3 +1s and
>> and one -1 which means it is one its way to pass.
> Two voted -1: Sebastian + Torsten
I thought Torsten was just quoting sebb -
>> ...but anyway - let's give it another go?
>
> Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is 3 +1s and
> and one -1 which means it is one its way to pass.
Two voted -1: Sebastian + Torsten
I think lets give another try - the problems are already solved and
the release process it
> COMPRESS-72
Yeah ... I remember that. I still don't think it's right. But whatever :)
>> ...but anyway - let's give it another go?
>
> Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is 3 +1s and
> and one -1 which means it is one its way to pass.
I am +1 for the jar to be released
On 2010-08-12, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> Should be fixed in trunk.
thanks.
> That said: The README is not what I would expect.
> I would expect that content to be in the NOTICE.
COMPRESS-72
> ...but anyway - let's give it another go?
Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is
>> [ ] +1 release it
>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>> [X] -1 no, do not release it because
>
> version error in release-notes
> 2 files missing from archives.
Should be fixed in trunk.
That said: The README is not what I would expect.
I would expect that content to be in the NOTICE.
...but any
Hi Christian,
+) works on Mac OS X 10.6 and java 1.6.0_20 from SVN tag
+) IntelliJ complained about a few JavaDoc & PMD issues but only minor stuff
+) RELEASE-NOTES.txt contains wrong version number
[X] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
Cheers,
S
On 2010-08-10, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/compress/1.1/RC1/
Talks about 1.0 being the latest release at several places, easy to be
fixed later and indepent of the release.
> Binaries:
and sources
> https://repository.apache.org/content/reposit
On 10 August 2010 05:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Commons Compress 1.1 is available for testing :-) Please have a look
> at it and vote.
>
> Note: this release has been made with Nexus and the new process described
> here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
>
> Tag:
>
> ht
Hi,
[x] +1 release it
Tested with commons-compress-1.1-src.tar.gz (SHA1:
eb2ae3125bae678a1615c0016e9bf7518771f26a) on Linux with Sun Java
1.6.0_16. Builds, passes all tests, and integrates well with Apache
Tika.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hello,
Commons Compress 1.1 is available for testing :-) Please have a look
at it and vote.
Note: this release has been made with Nexus and the new process described here:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/compress/tags/commons-compre
12 matches
Mail list logo
