Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-13 Thread Hank Grabowski
A more reasonable and measured article that appeared in JavaWorld: http://www.javaworld.com/article/3003197/security/library-misuse-exposes-leading-java-platforms-to-attack.html On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Donald Freeman wrote: > > I wanted to forward this on. I found this article this m

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-13 Thread Donald Freeman
I wanted to forward this on. I found this article this morning talking about the issue on itworld. http://www.itworld.com/article/3004632/thousands-of-java-applications-vulnerable-to-nine-month-old-remote-code-execution-exploit.html Thanks,Don Freeman On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Gary

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/12/2015 07:14 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thomas Neidhart wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> in order to provide a work-around for the known remote code exploit via >> java de-serialization of malicious InvokerTransformer instances, I would >> like to start a vote to release Commons Co

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/11/2015 05:27 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi all, > > in order to provide a work-around for the known remote code exploit via > java de-serialization of malicious InvokerTransformer instances, I would > like to start a vote to release Commons Collections 3.2.2 based on RC2. > > Notes: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Thomas, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi all, > > in order to provide a work-around for the known remote code exploit via > java de-serialization of malicious InvokerTransformer instances, I would > like to start a vote to release Commons Collections 3.2.2 based on RC2. > > Notes: > > * the sit

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Nov 11, 2015 11:45 PM, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote: > > Le 12/11/2015 04:39, Phil Steitz a écrit : > > > That is frankly ridiculous. To -1 a release based on false positive report about files not included in the release is absurd. > > I agree with Phil. We are releasing code, not reports. Keep in

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread luc
Le 2015-11-12 10:18, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : On 2015-11-11, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Please review the release candidate and vote. +1 for the release. Luc +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2015-11-11, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Please review the release candidate and vote. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2015-11-12, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -1 > That is frankly ridiculous. Couldn't agree more. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For addition

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-11 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 12/11/2015 04:39, Phil Steitz a écrit : > That is frankly ridiculous. To -1 a release based on false positive report > about files not included in the release is absurd. I agree with Phil. We are releasing code, not reports. Emmanuel ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-11 Thread Phil Steitz
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > -1 That is frankly ridiculous. To -1 a release based on false positive report about files not included in the release is absurd. Phil > > I'm sorry, but the RAT check is still not right. > > If you look at the POM: > > https://svn.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory
FYI, I was testing with: Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-10T08:41:47-08:00) Maven home: E:\Java\apache-maven-3.3.9\bin\.. Java version: 1.8.0_65, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_65\jre Default locale: en_US, platform encodi

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory
FYI, I was testing with: On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > -1 > > I'm sorry, but the RAT check is still not right. > > If you look at the POM: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/collections/tags/COLLECTIONS_3_2_2_RC2/pom.xml > > you will see: > > src/tes

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-11 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Thomas, build works fine with Java 1.6 on Windows 10, artifacts and site look good. So +1. Unfortunately, I have currently not the time to dig deeper into the problematic addressed by this release; so I cannot comment on the fixes. As I do not have a current project that depends on collections

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-11 Thread Gary Gregory
-1 I'm sorry, but the RAT check is still not right. If you look at the POM: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/collections/tags/COLLECTIONS_3_2_2_RC2/pom.xml you will see: src/test/resources/data/test/* This folder does not exist. Which is why I see the following when I build:

[VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-11 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi all, in order to provide a work-around for the known remote code exploit via java de-serialization of malicious InvokerTransformer instances, I would like to start a vote to release Commons Collections 3.2.2 based on RC2. Notes: * the site will not be published, it just serves as a reference