That would be -1, on the bits in the RC. I will change to +1 if we
can get the site build working on Unix or bundle the docs with the
binary release. It looks like the necessary fix has been applied to
fix the site build in trunk, so all that is needed is to roll a final
RC.
Phil
On Sat, May 24
Phil, was there a vote attached to your suggestion?
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> A few c
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A few comments on this release.
>>
>> Typo in the project description in the pom.xml file: replace
>> "implmentation" with "implementation".
>>
On 24/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:13 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 24/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 2:13 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, s
btw +1 from me
Niall
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main changes since RC1 are that the ant build now works on JDK 1.3
> and the Logging dependency has been upgraded to the latest 1.1.1
>
> The artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~nial
On 24/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 11:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, s
On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:17 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Lu
On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Niall Pemberton a écri
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:51 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Niall Pemberton a écrit :
>> >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PRO
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton a écrit :
>>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A few comments on this release.
Typo in the project description in the pom.
On 23/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> A few comments on this release.
> >>>
> >>> T
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton a écrit :
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> A few comments on this release.
>>>
>>> Typo in the project description in the pom.xml file: replace
>>> "implmentat
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A few comments on this release.
>>
>> Typo in the project description in the pom.xml file: replace
>> "implmentation" with "implementation".
>>
>> Extracting files from the commons-chain-1.2-src
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
We don't have a CommandListener - but for ChainListener there is a
working example webapp, which I added a while ago to be able to test
the changes for CHAIN-35 (ticket for example webapp is CHAIN-36)
The other class was ChainServlet, not CommandListener, sorry.
Yo
+1
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I'm a bit concerned by the low test coverage (64% lines and 55% branches
> > according to Cobertura). Some classes like CommandListene
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned by the low test coverage (64% lines and 55% branches
> according to Cobertura). Some classes like CommandListener and ChainListener
> aren't tested at all. The faces package isn't tested but its classe
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few comments on this release.
>
> Typo in the project description in the pom.xml file: replace
> "implmentation" with "implementation".
>
> Extracting files from the commons-chain-1.2-src.tar.gz archive in a
> Linux box l
I'm a bit concerned by the low test coverage (64% lines and 55% branches
according to Cobertura). Some classes like CommandListener and
ChainListener aren't tested at all. The faces package isn't tested but
its classes seem more trivial.
Emmanuel Bourg
A few comments on this release.
Typo in the project description in the pom.xml file: replace
"implmentation" with "implementation".
Extracting files from the commons-chain-1.2-src.tar.gz archive in a
Linux box leads to an all lower case file name for "license-header.txt",
which leads to an error
+1
Oliver
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> The main changes since RC1 are that the ant build now works on JDK 1.3
> and the Logging dependency has been upgraded to the latest 1.1.1
>
> The artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC2/
>
> SVN Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/
On 22/05/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > [X] +1 I support this release
>
> > [ ] +0 I am OK with this release
> > [ ] -0 OK, but
> > [ ] -1 I do not support this release
> >
>
>
>
> Sigs, sum
On 5/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [X] +1 I support this release
> [ ] +0 I am OK with this release
> [ ] -0 OK, but
> [ ] -1 I do not support this release
>
Sigs, sums, manifests I checked are good. Tried all builds on JDK 1.6.
-Rahul
-
The main changes since RC1 are that the ant build now works on JDK 1.3
and the Logging dependency has been upgraded to the latest 1.1.1
The artifacts are here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/chain_1_2_RC2/
SVN Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/chain/tags/CHAIN_1_2_RC2/
Site:
htt
26 matches
Mail list logo