Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 5/21/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +0 > > > > We should upgrade all of our own dependencies to the latest ones when > > making releases, as far as possible. Especially the bottom tier ones > > l

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
This vote is cancelled, I'll prepare an new RC shortly to fix some of the issues Rahul and Sebb raised. Thanks for the feedback Niall On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to > release the fix

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:52 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Not sure if this should be regarded as a problem or not, but I get a >> test failure when using IBM Java: >> >> java version "1.6.0" >> Java(TM) SE Runti

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:52 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this should be regarded as a problem or not, but I get a > test failure when using IBM Java: > > java version "1.6.0" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pwi3260-20071123_01) > IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, J2RE 1.6.0 IBM J

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Paul Benedict
Perhaps the Serializations should be looked at. Most web app servers serialize all their info out when restarting. +1 on the release, btw Paul On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:52 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if this should be regarded as a problem or not, but I get a > test failure w

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread sebb
Not sure if this should be regarded as a problem or not, but I get a test failure when using IBM Java: java version "1.6.0" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pwi3260-20071123_01) IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, J2RE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows XP x86-32 jvmwi3260-20071121_15015 (JIT enabled) J9VM - 200711

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +0 > > We should upgrade all of our own dependencies to the latest ones when > making releases, as far as possible. Especially the bottom tier ones > like logging (in this case, to 1.1.1, which contains good number of > fi

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:42 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread sebb
On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+0 We should upgrade all of our own dependencies to the latest ones when making releases, as far as possible. Especially the bottom tier ones like logging (in this case, to 1.1.1, which contains good number of fixes over 1.0.4). As indicated by my vote, I don't consider this to be a blocker. Eve

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:05 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I would like to do a bug fix relea

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread sebb
On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to > >> release the fix for CHAIN-33[1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to >> release the fix for CHAIN-33[1] - which hit a Struts user recently >> (see STR-3143[2]) - but there

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-20 Thread sebb
On 21/05/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to > release the fix for CHAIN-33[1] - which hit a Struts user recently > (see STR-3143[2]) - but there are a few other bug fixes as well > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jir

[VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1

2008-05-20 Thread Niall Pemberton
I would like to do a bug fix release of Commons Chain - mainly to release the fix for CHAIN-33[1] - which hit a Struts user recently (see STR-3143[2]) - but there are a few other bug fixes as well [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-33 [2] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-